Euthanasia
In this modern era, the phenomenon of Euthanasia and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that taking someone lives who suffer from a painful disease is highly beneficial to the society, such a critical issue regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by the substantial number of experts in an array of fields. I am inclined to believe that assisting patients to commit a suicide can be a plus and I will analyze this throughout this essay.
From the medical perspective, Euthanasia provides the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that severe pain, as well as incurable diseases, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I conducted an academic experiment which discovered in most countries it is illegal to perform such a horrible act. Thus, the beneficial ramification of easing the significant pain apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of ethics, Euthanasia might increase the consequences of coma. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of dedicating their organs relate to this reality that the demerits of religious principles pertain to inhuman. As a tangible example, a recent scientific research undertaken by Harvard University has asserted that the downside of Islamic view is correlated negatively with God’s decision. Hence, it is logical to assume that preconceived notion of voluntary death.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of Euthanasia far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of patients serious injury prove the significance of being unresponsive to drugs, but also pinpoints peaceful death implications.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...gnificant pain apparently can be seen. Within the realm of ethics, Euthanasia m...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1497.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 272.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.50367647059 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1116214488 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 183.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.672794117647 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 483.3 379.143842365 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.4805114151 50.4703680194 102% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.75 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.6666666667 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.182535579844 0.242375264174 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0685951580977 0.0925447433944 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0994778930478 0.071462118173 139% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.105031445393 0.151781067708 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0145012524528 0.0609392437508 24% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.8 12.6369458128 125% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.11 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 110.0 55.0591133005 200% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.