“Euthanasia is no longer acceptable in the modern society.” Discuss the solutions to accept this fact.
Recently, the phenomenon of euthanasia has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “what is the positive and negative consequences?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that it is no longer acceptable in modern society, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the medical standpoint, euthanasia is bound up inextricably with mercy killing, which indicates they lead to both cardinal sin and a criminal act. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between environmental factors and hectic lifestyle as well as an exponential increase in ethical issues. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of terminal disease is correlated positively with not only humanity crisis but also globalization.
Within the realm of society, without the slightest doubt, euthanasia attribute to deathbed, in that it would come down to cancer, poor people, and bed-ridden. A salient example of such attribution is a hidden agenda, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take an alternative solution for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint current system problems. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of education.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I entirely agree that euthanasia is not a pragmatic solution. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1524.0 1207.87684729 126% => OK
No of words: 273.0 242.827586207 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.58241758242 5.00649968141 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06481385082 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23668608391 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 187.0 139.433497537 134% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.684981684982 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.7546514957 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.230769231 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0 20.9669160288 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.160798057089 0.242375264174 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.047225110596 0.0925447433944 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0883266840302 0.071462118173 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0950220972596 0.151781067708 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.101604939973 0.0609392437508 167% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.4 12.6369458128 122% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 53.1260098522 78% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.08 11.5310837438 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.98 8.32886699507 132% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 55.0591133005 198% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 16.5 9.94827586207 166% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.