Mass media like TV and newspapers influence people, particularly young generation. Do you think it works a pivot to shape the society?
Recently, mass media has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “will mass media like TV and newspapers influence people?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that mass media works as a pivot to shape the society, particularly young generation, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the social and political standpoint, public opinion is bound up inextricably with governmental policies, which indicates they lead to both public perception and social conduct. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between environmental factors and hectic lifestyle as well as an exponential increase in moral issues. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of having a destructive impact is correlated positively with not only globalization but also political policy reform.
Within the realm of journalism and telecommunication, without the slightest doubt, editorial policies attribute to dominant media, in that it would come down to privacy invasion, political propaganda, and censorship. A salient example of such attribution is a hidden agenda, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take surveillance for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint current system problems. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of the modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of the negative dimensions of social networking.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I entirely agree that mass media play an important role in shaping people’s ideas. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1683.0 1207.87684729 139% => OK
No of words: 296.0 242.827586207 122% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68581081081 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.23323166191 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 139.433497537 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.685810810811 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 520.2 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.747255884 50.4703680194 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 129.461538462 104.977214359 123% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.191511832869 0.242375264174 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0544131302723 0.0925447433944 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.095379114634 0.071462118173 133% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123314133473 0.151781067708 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.153175777566 0.0609392437508 251% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.08 8.32886699507 133% => OK
difficult_words: 119.0 55.0591133005 216% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.