Euthanasia is no longer acceptable in the modern society. Discuss the solutions to accept this fact.
“Euthanasia” is a process of eliminating life of an ill person. The proponents believe that it should be legalized as it helps people to relieve unbearable pain. Whereas, the opponents of this idea suggest that killing someone to relieve pain is immoral and should not be practised. In this essay, I shall delve into the details and will cover both sides of arguments.
To begin with, euthanasia is a debatable topic. Very few countries have accepted it legally and there are many countries who are against it. On the positive side, it helps people to voluntarily die if they are suffering from a non-curable disease or in a coma for a longer time-period. There are many cases where patient’s family has spent their life saving and not able to sooth the pain of the patient. For example, in Norway, euthanasia is legal and any patient can apply for it with the government’s guidelines.
On the other side, people can also misuse the system. There have been many cases where children ask for their parent’s death to capture their saving and property. In today’s time, it is not morally good to voluntarily kill someone only if he is not well.
To sum up, legalization of euthanasia is good only if the patient is suffering from non-curable disease and government must make stringent rules to prevent the misuse of it.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, so, well, whereas, for example, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1122.0 1207.87684729 93% => OK
No of words: 228.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.92105263158 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.88582923847 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06613769576 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 131.0 139.433497537 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.574561403509 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 366.3 379.143842365 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 33.4837238567 50.4703680194 66% => OK
Chars per sentence: 86.3076923077 104.977214359 82% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5384615385 20.9669160288 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.07692307692 7.25397266985 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 8.0 2.75862068966 290% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0838818603742 0.242375264174 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0297284592001 0.0925447433944 32% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.027240349851 0.071462118173 38% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0452698358927 0.151781067708 30% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0327456713752 0.0609392437508 54% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 10.5 12.6369458128 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.96 11.5310837438 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.29 8.32886699507 100% => OK
difficult_words: 55.0 55.0591133005 100% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.