Do you think the school should have curriculum asking students to play old drama and work for theatre centuries ago?
Recently, a phenomenon of learning art and theatre in the school has raised a moot question around the world. Many believe that studying art and other literature subjects raise awareness among students, but opponents think it as a sheer waste of time and money. In my opinion, art and plays are a crucial part of human civilisation. This essay will illustrate various arguments, merits and demerits.
To begin with, learning art and theatre has been a significant part of the human journey for centuries. Not only it teaches history, traditions, customs but also preserves knowledge about the past. Further, playing drama and literate widen the perspective of pupils. For instance, the famous playwright Shakespeare's works have been immortalised his time and now the young generation is keen to learn about the past experiences.
On other hands, in today's cut-throat competitive market learning art and theatre is considered as wastage of time, resources and productive years. Many parents believe that students always live in the imaginative world, thus affecting productive years of adulthood and time. Moreover, it also influences the employment perspective of students.
To recapitulate, it is safe to assert that playing drama and working for theatre certainly help students to understand the past and essential for overall development but pupils must choose the options carefully without affecting employment perspective.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 203, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...subjects raise awareness among students, but opponents think it as a sheer waste ...
^^
Line 3, column 411, Rule ID: PAST_EXPERIENCE_MEMORY[1]
Message: Use simply 'experiences'.
Suggestion: experiences
...g generation is keen to learn about the past experiences. On other hands, in todays cut-throa...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, moreover, so, thus, for instance, in my opinion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 8.36945812808 191% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 31.9359605911 85% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1217.0 1207.87684729 101% => OK
No of words: 220.0 242.827586207 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.53181818182 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.85128510684 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.9440898915 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.631818181818 0.580463131201 109% => OK
syllable_count: 369.0 379.143842365 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.1853001865 50.4703680194 103% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.416666667 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3333333333 20.9669160288 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.41666666667 7.25397266985 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183543754409 0.242375264174 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0573402704287 0.0925447433944 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.054022991081 0.071462118173 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109623022267 0.151781067708 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0585422107137 0.0609392437508 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 12.6369458128 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 53.1260098522 84% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.79 11.5310837438 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.48 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.