Design of buildings and its positive or negative impacts on people to work or live in.. Discuss
It is safe to say that aesthetically pleasing buildings or houses bring calmness to the eyes and mind. Designing of the buildings is a form of art and our world is full of beautiful buildings. People believe that the interior of any house makes impacts on its residents. In this essay, I will delve into both sides of the arguments.
To begin with, a clean and modern looking room always change the mood and gives positive energy. Many people spend a fortune on the interior of their house and prefer to live in a modern looking place, which they thinks brings prosperity and calmness to the mind. Interior designing has flourished in leaps and bound in the recent times, it helps to utilise the limited space and creates rooms considering many factors like lighting, spacing and ventilation. Studies show that people who work in well lighted and ventilated buildings are more productive than their counterparts. For example, in India Vastu Kala is a science for deciding where and how the building should be constructed, it also determines the direction of door and window.
Further, a shabby and untidy building creates negative vibes around the area. As per a study conducted by Human Housing Society, people who live in slums and unhygienic buildings are prone to health ailments. Also, as design brings aesthetic to the building and its surrounding but it is a costly affair. Many people cannot afford the beauty of art.
In conclusion, as per preceded arguments, it is safe to say that the design of a building certainly makes a positive impact on human life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 214, Rule ID: NON3PRS_VERB[2]
Message: The pronoun 'they' must be used with a non-third-person form of a verb: 'think'
Suggestion: think
...e in a modern looking place, which they thinks brings prosperity and calmness to the m...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, look, so, well, for example, in conclusion, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 17.0 8.36945812808 203% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1310.0 1207.87684729 108% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.9063670412 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64171616758 2.71678728327 97% => OK
Unique words: 156.0 139.433497537 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.584269662921 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 400.5 379.143842365 106% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.3290059727 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5714285714 104.977214359 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.0714285714 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.14285714286 7.25397266985 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.318867978493 0.242375264174 132% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.097095600259 0.0925447433944 105% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598906799115 0.071462118173 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192620828282 0.151781067708 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0420716264227 0.0609392437508 69% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 60.65 53.1260098522 114% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 10.9458128079 87% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.5310837438 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.9 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 73.0 55.0591133005 133% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.94827586207 75% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.