Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree.

Essay topics:

Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree.

People always are learning and practicing through their whole lives. From reading words in text book such as toy, car, train etc., people have the concept and ideas. They further understand the actual meaning of these words by playing toys and riding or driving cars, trains etc.

Education (books) and experience are the main two channels for People to gain their knowledge. Each play different roles for people. In my opinion, knowledge from experience is more important than that from books.

Experience first can prove if the knowledge form books are true or false. Textbooks are very wonderful in teaching people essential principles, how is the world looks like? what is the basic law of change of people and things? We can learn a lot through primary school, secondary school until university. However, people can only understand the really meaning of those form books and justify them if they are right through practices. A few hundred years ago, people learnt from text book that the earth was flat. However scientists found that was wrong through observations and measurement.

The knowledge from experience can improve and advance
the world and our society. As books have limitation, they only teach us the what people found in the past. The knowledge from the books are constrained to the certain conditions and environment. For example, mould and tools design for plastics industry, the university course only taught me very simple cases, most knowledge are obtained from various different and complicated cases in my career.

There are a lot new inventions and new products which could not be found from textbooks. Our society and world are developed through continuous practices, those knowledge, never found in books, such as internet, e-business etc. are all developed through new practices.

"The truth comes from practices and experience", people are continually discovering new things and assessing the creditability of the knowledge written in books. The knowledge from experience help us much more than those from books.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 174, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: What
...rinciples, how is the world looks like? what is the basic law of change of people an...
^^^^
Line 5, column 293, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...h primary school, secondary school until university. However, people can only und...
^^
Line 5, column 515, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: However,
...from text book that the earth was flat. However scientists found that was wrong through...
^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 54, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... from experience can improve and advance the world and our society. As books have...
^^^
Line 10, column 156, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this knowledge' or 'those knowledges'?
Suggestion: this knowledge; those knowledges
...developed through continuous practices, those knowledge, never found in books, such as internet...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 12, column 244, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...elp us much more than those from books.
^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, look, really, second, so, as to, for example, such as, in my opinion

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 18.0 8.36945812808 215% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1743.0 1207.87684729 144% => OK
No of words: 327.0 242.827586207 135% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33027522936 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.25242769721 3.92707691288 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67187298629 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 139.433497537 131% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.556574923547 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 379.143842365 131% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 7.0 1.56157635468 448% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 12.6551724138 174% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.5024630542 68% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.0003534129 50.4703680194 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.2272727273 104.977214359 75% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.8636363636 20.9669160288 71% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 7.25397266985 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 7.0 4.12807881773 170% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 6.0 5.33497536946 112% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 10.0 2.91625615764 343% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.123964909635 0.242375264174 51% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0421059648539 0.0925447433944 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0448056314302 0.071462118173 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.068869723653 0.151781067708 45% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0408801058284 0.0609392437508 67% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.1 12.6369458128 88% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 65.73 53.1260098522 124% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 7.6 10.9458128079 69% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.04 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.66 8.32886699507 92% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 5.5 9.94827586207 55% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.3980295567 73% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.