Experience is the more effective way to teach, compared to the books? Agree or disagree?
Books are indeed a trustworthy friend of human still practical experiences teach an unforgetable touch in anybody's life. This is contentious question where some people have positive aspect, however, others believe negative as well. I am deeply agree with this point and will present reasons to support my viewpoint.
There are myriads of aspect to support this point that experience is more prominent way to teach, compared to the books. The preponderant one is, no one can provide you personal touch to make correct instead of a teacher. In the technology world, we can research any kind of thing online without any barriers. However, a teacher can correct us regarding the thing which we are putting our efforts immensely. It is tendency of human to learn new chapter of life by problems and personal touoch. For an instance, any one can watch a video on the topic of 'how to drive a car' on youtube but only personal instuctor can teach when to press breaks, how to inform other vehicle that you are taking left or right which would not only safe life of the student but others as well.
Another pivotal point for supporting the same topic is, practical efforts encourage interest of the person which books cannot provide. One of other factor is when human start reading of something, can lead to attract other topic. Consequently, these kind of things can divert the focus. In gist, it can be say that the more we sweat in training, the less we bleed in combat.
In conclusion, on the basis of above mention point one can conclude that experience is backbone to learn a new chapter of life compared to theoratical way. Although, everyone can have different prospect but as per my understanding it is making us aware about negative or positive aspect of the things which we try.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 245, Rule ID: BEEN_PART_AGREEMENT[2]
Message: Consider using a past participle here: 'agreed'.
Suggestion: agreed
...s believe negative as well. I am deeply agree with this point and will present reason...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 512, Rule ID: ANY_BODY[1]
Message: Did you mean 'anyone'?
Suggestion: anyone
...s and personal touoch. For an instance, any one can watch a video on the topic of how t...
^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 245, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this kind' or 'these kinds'?
Suggestion: this kind; these kinds
...d to attract other topic. Consequently, these kind of things can divert the focus. In gist...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, regarding, so, still, well, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1480.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 309.0 242.827586207 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.78964401294 5.00649968141 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1926597562 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.56678579415 2.71678728327 94% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559870550162 0.580463131201 96% => OK
syllable_count: 463.5 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.1183488244 50.4703680194 99% => OK
Chars per sentence: 98.6666666667 104.977214359 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141470814096 0.242375264174 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0523400704056 0.0925447433944 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869698682193 0.071462118173 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0883578711716 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0268952771526 0.0609392437508 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 12.6369458128 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 53.1260098522 112% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.5 11.5310837438 91% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.15 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.