Experience is the more effective way to teach, compared to the books? Agree or disagree?
Books are indeed a trustworthy friend of human still practical experiences teach an unforgettable touch in anybody's life. This is a contentious question where some people have a positive aspect, however, others believe negative as well. I deeply agree with this point and will present reasons to support my viewpoint.
There are myriads of aspect to support this point that experience is the more prominent way to teach, compared to the books. The preponderant one is, no one can provide you with a personal touch to make correct instead of a teacher. In the technology world, we can research any kind of thing online without any barriers. However, a teacher can correct us regarding the thing which we are putting our efforts immensely. It is the tendency of human to learn a new chapter of life by problems and personal touch. For an instance, anyone can watch a video on the topic of 'how to drive a car' on YouTube but the only personal instructor can teach when to press breaks, how to inform other vehicles that you are taking left or right which would not only safe life of the student but others as well.
Another pivotal point for supporting the same topic is, practical efforts encourage the interest of the person which books cannot provide. One of the other factor is when human start reading something, can lead to attracting other topics. Consequently, these kinds of things can divert the focus. In gist, it can say that the more we sweat in training, the less we bleed in combat.
In conclusion, on the basis of above mention point, one can conclude that experience is the backbone to learn a new chapter of life compared to a theoretical way. Although, everyone can have different prospect as per my understanding it is making us aware of a negative or positive aspect of the things which we try.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, consequently, however, if, regarding, so, still, well, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 6.10837438424 213% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1504.0 1207.87684729 125% => OK
No of words: 317.0 242.827586207 131% => OK
Chars per words: 4.74447949527 5.00649968141 95% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21953715646 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6162053144 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 173.0 139.433497537 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545741324921 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 470.7 379.143842365 124% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 51.0826780817 50.4703680194 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.266666667 104.977214359 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.1333333333 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.46666666667 7.25397266985 75% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.143274057503 0.242375264174 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0526420181494 0.0925447433944 57% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0869574772743 0.071462118173 122% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0898345650232 0.151781067708 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0270520866143 0.0609392437508 44% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 12.6369458128 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.1260098522 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.21 11.5310837438 89% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.12 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.