Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree?
Recently, the phenomenon of the importance of acquiring experience and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of the formal education theories is highly beneficial, such an issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that being an expert can be a plus and I will scrutinize that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, the mentor's advice, as well as book reading, can provide the community with some noticeable effects which rooted in the fact that the merits of the valuable experience transformation to the youth, as well as effective education outcome, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, When I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the spectacular value of learning over effective action. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both new methods of successful teaching while working and youngster guidance apparently can be seen.
On the other hand, within the realm of science, passive ways of reading and book-based studies might increase the consequence of less qualified learners. Moreover, fundamental aspects of traditional ineffective processes of training would relate to this reality that the demerits of useless guideline instructions pertain to mounting unfavourable influences of non-experienced young characters. As an example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of inconsiderable practice is correlated negatively with lack of skill. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of undisareble results of learning.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of practical learning programs far weigh its drawbacks, not only do the advantages of obtaining experience prove the significance of skill improvement process, but also pinpoint long-term implications.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 70 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | Alireza.r.68 | 85 | view |
| 2020-01-29 | manraj123 | 55 | view |
| 2020-01-28 | manraj123 | 80 | view |
| 2020-01-27 | Alireza.r.68 | 88 | view |
- Parents should be held legally responsible for children’s act. What is your opinion? 88
- In a cashless society, people use more credits. What are the advantages and disadvantages of this phenomenon? 80
- Some democrats claim that people who do not take part in voting processes do not have the right to complaint about the situation their communities are in. What is your position regarding this opinion? 85
- More information available online so library books are useless, agree or disagree with statement? 85
- What is the best invention of last 100 years, the computer, antibiotics, the airplane, and explain why? 11
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 32, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'mentors'' or 'mentor's'?
Suggestion: mentors'; mentor's
... essay. From a general standpoint, the mentors advice, as well as book reading, can pr...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 5.75862068966 243% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1732.0 1207.87684729 143% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.77333333333 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.3245283709 2.71678728327 122% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 139.433497537 145% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.673333333333 0.580463131201 116% => OK
syllable_count: 546.3 379.143842365 144% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 6.0 1.71428571429 350% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 69.2003917249 50.4703680194 137% => OK
Chars per sentence: 157.454545455 104.977214359 150% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.2727272727 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.72727272727 7.25397266985 120% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.132195210991 0.242375264174 55% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0391047352665 0.0925447433944 42% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0436804117454 0.071462118173 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0643057436464 0.151781067708 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0539616233504 0.0609392437508 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 19.4 12.6369458128 154% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 27.15 53.1260098522 51% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 16.2 10.9458128079 148% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.48 11.5310837438 143% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 11.4 8.32886699507 137% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 55.0591133005 222% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.