Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books? Agree or disagree.
One of the most discussed issues today relates to how experience is better way to teach than books. In the following essay, I will discuss some of the biggest causes associated with the teaching mechanism, before suggesting possible solution.
The main cause related to the education system is the teaching methodology. The reason for this is that the methods of teaching can play an important role in society.
In addition, the students can be a major aspect that relates to modern society these days, so people must pay close attention to it. For example, practical method is undoubtedly the most accepted teaching methodology in India.
In my opinion, the best approach to overcome theoretical teaching by books is the practical way of experience in imparting education to the students.
I often argue that in fact the importance of practical teaching methods must not be overlooked because education affect students, the future of any nation.
Furthermore, modern education system utilizing pratical methodologies will continue to influence the future of preachers.
For instance, the Indian students will prefer the practical ways instead of theoretical ways of teaching.
In conclusion, the practical ways of teaching using experience is better than theoretical ways using books.
It has now been shown that the education system will give better results by using experience based teaching methods and the ongoing teaching mechanism by books will take time to accept this change.
It is expected that modern society will be much influential and creative in the future.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, look, so, for example, for instance, in addition, in conclusion, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 5.75862068966 260% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1350.0 1207.87684729 112% => OK
No of words: 249.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.42168674699 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.97237131171 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81758321635 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 132.0 139.433497537 95% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.530120481928 0.580463131201 91% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 412.2 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 7.0 1.56157635468 448% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.0466766897 50.4703680194 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.846153846 104.977214359 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.1538461538 20.9669160288 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.69230769231 7.25397266985 106% => OK
Paragraphs: 10.0 4.12807881773 242% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.212513318809 0.242375264174 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0847643357995 0.0925447433944 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0733666989061 0.071462118173 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0967180757882 0.151781067708 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0755126238529 0.0609392437508 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 12.6369458128 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.16 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.64 8.32886699507 104% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.