Experience is a more effective way to teach, compared to books. Experimental learning or traditional learning in high school and university, Which one do you agree is more effective?
Personal experiences are the more effective way of teaching compared to traditional books has always been a debatable topic. Many people believe that learning through our own experiences can help us in hard times of life. I strongly agree with the statement that the knowledge that we gain from our daily situations are worth compared to traditional learning. This essay would further discuss the benefits associated with learning through experience with real time examples and thus lead to a plausible conclusion.
To commence with, experience means the information that we earn from different incidents that we observe and face in routine life. It means that this is not limited and it will be varied from situation to situation. The experiences we gather our daily activities help us to rectify our future action. Moving further, each and everything will not be mentioned in the books that we read and lessons taught in university and high school, few things we learn from our own practice that happens. For instance, no book or no lecture will teach us how to live our lives alone, how to share our feelings and how to create self-respect, it is the hard times that we face in our lives teach us how to overcome all these problems.
Furthermore, content in the textbooks provides us only basic knowledge of topic like techniques of selling, production, marketing, and planning but these techniques can be implemented only if we have a better experience in respective field. The hardest and important lessons we learn in life comes from our participation in different situations and mastering those skills by practice. Experiencing our own mistakes and disasters will help us to deal with life in tough conditions.
According to the arguments aforementioned, one can reach out to the conclusion that books, teachers, and parents give us guidelines but our experience to the situations give the perfection of life.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 6, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to deal with life in tough conditions. According to the arguments aforementione...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, furthermore, if, so, thus, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 46.0 20.9802955665 219% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 44.0 31.9359605911 138% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1613.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 315.0 242.827586207 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.12063492063 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21286593061 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89836923419 2.71678728327 107% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.542857142857 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 492.3 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 50.9088987932 50.4703680194 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.076923077 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2307692308 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.38461538462 7.25397266985 47% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.158472108208 0.242375264174 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0657788073409 0.0925447433944 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0805192815991 0.071462118173 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.103898249906 0.151781067708 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0862037379988 0.0609392437508 141% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 11.5310837438 110% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.89 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 55.0591133005 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.94827586207 116% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.