Formal written assessment is good way to assess the children performance or not.
The issue that conventional written method can assess the pupils’ performance was debatable, has become more controversial. The substantial influence of gauging the children performance has evoked the controversy over the potential impact of its trend in recent years. From my perspective, I am inclined to ponder that this traditional method is flawed and unable to measure the children performance comprehensively. The essay will further elaborate reasons and explanations for supporting the notion and will deduce the dialectic conclusion.
At the outset, myriad conspicuous reasons can be brought up to justify that this particular method is out of date and has no potential capacity to assess the children according to new era’s requirements. The Preponderant explanation lies in the fact that this method only focuses on pupil’s writing and memorising skills, however, in order to gain successful career, children require other analytical skills. Hence, this method has lack of many necessary other skills.
Another key justification upholding this notion is that in this method the risk of cheating is high, as someone has the access on previous exams papers can easily achieve high grades, eventually these grades will not assist him in competitive job market. Consequently, this fragile formal method need to be reviewed by academic intellectuals.
After precisely analysing the facts, I would like to encapsulate that other methods like semester system, group discussion and presentation are comparatively far better than the formal written method.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... better than the formal written method.
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
consequently, hence, however, if, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1343.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 236.0 242.827586207 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.6906779661 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.91947592106 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.1469646073 2.71678728327 116% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.648305084746 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 418.5 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.6132797192 50.4703680194 114% => OK
Chars per sentence: 134.3 104.977214359 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.6 20.9669160288 113% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.6 7.25397266985 50% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15516381313 0.242375264174 64% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0628351896174 0.0925447433944 68% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0594639258876 0.071462118173 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0885853423332 0.151781067708 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0618041133372 0.0609392437508 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.4 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 55.0591133005 153% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.