A good listener is better than a good talker in a social situation.
It has long been a subject of discussion whether a good talker in a social situation or not. In my opinion, the former notion has several elements that deserve attention and I will explain why using pertinent arguments.
There are myriad of arguments in favor of my context, and the most conspicuous one lies in the fact that people should be extra careful with their decisions. For example, according to a recent survey done by Stanford University, 45% people benefit from the above mentioned notion, whereas 30% people face disadvantages due to it. Hence, it is apparent why many citizens are of the above stance.
Another argument in support of my view is that governments worldwide have become more active in dealing with this situation. To illustrate, as per recent academic research carried out by the Australian government, 60% citizens gained immensely from the proposed government reforms. They improved their existing scenario tremendously that paved the way for a better economic future. Therefore, not only will this make people more careful pragmatic in their approach, but also will it lead to a better living standard.
From what has been discussed above, it is clear that the benefits of the given significantly outweigh the drawbacks. Lastly, in my opinion, it would wise to say a good listener is better than a good talker in a social situation.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, lastly, so, therefore, whereas, for example, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 8.36945812808 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1143.0 1207.87684729 95% => OK
No of words: 226.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.05752212389 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87727950738 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76905256834 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 145.0 139.433497537 104% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.641592920354 0.580463131201 111% => OK
syllable_count: 360.0 379.143842365 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 29.9851202768 50.4703680194 59% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.909090909 104.977214359 99% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.5454545455 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 7.25397266985 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234996221728 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0913154174419 0.0925447433944 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.180249885129 0.071462118173 252% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.164199021124 0.151781067708 108% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.161064067831 0.0609392437508 264% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 12.6369458128 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 53.1260098522 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 11.5310837438 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.24 8.32886699507 111% => OK
difficult_words: 66.0 55.0591133005 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 82.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 74.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.