The time people devote in job leaves very little time for personal life.
The problem of the time people devote in job leaves very little time for personal life which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that is it hazardous while others reject this notion. However, the substantial influence of this trend has sparked the controversy over the potential impact in recent years. In my opinion, the former proposition appears to be more rational. So, this essay will further elaborate the negative effects of this trend and thus will lead to a logical conclusion.
To begin with, there are myriad of reasons which will further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that people are very busy in their work and they have no enough time to live with their family. Another pivotal aspect of this trend is that if people do not spend time in their family they can effects on their relationships. Hence, it is apparent why many are against in favor of this trend.
On the other hand, in these days people hardworking and they have no time to meet with their friends as well as family. Moreover, this is serious problem which are faced by people in their life. For example, in foreign countries people have to do more work they are not able to spend their time with their children, friends and family.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the problem of the time people devote in job leaves very little time for personal life can be successfully addressed, provided that the above stand measure are taken.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 329, Rule ID: DID_BASEFORM[1]
Message: The verb 'can' requires the base form of the verb: 'effect'
Suggestion: effect
...not spend time in their family they can effects on their relationships. Hence, it is ap...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for example, as well as, in my opinion, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 29.0 20.9802955665 138% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1293.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 267.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 4.84269662921 5.00649968141 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04229324003 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.44968444169 2.71678728327 90% => OK
Unique words: 140.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524344569288 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 404.1 379.143842365 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.5858240868 50.4703680194 126% => OK
Chars per sentence: 117.545454545 104.977214359 112% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.2727272727 20.9669160288 116% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.8181818182 7.25397266985 163% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.391575981339 0.242375264174 162% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.148414880331 0.0925447433944 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.183237375609 0.071462118173 256% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.278024986122 0.151781067708 183% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.142569400162 0.0609392437508 234% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 12.6369458128 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 55.58 53.1260098522 105% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.09 11.5310837438 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.2 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 57.0 55.0591133005 104% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.