The Government reduce their investment in arts, music and painting agree or disagree
The discussion on government reduce their investment is arts, music and painting is a debatable topic and people around the globe are divided in their arguments. The subject attracts majority of view from people among people of concern. In this essay I shall scrutinize both points of view by providing some relevant examples and explanation before drawing any conclusion.
There are myriad of reasons which will further explain this arguments but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that now days many movies and arts is increasing day by day which is more fine. Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that 2017 in one movie is release Singh is king many things learn from her movie and 80% people do like movies. Needless to say, all these merits stand in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate these arguments and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but one of the most alarming one is that many people do like movies but the arts or movies is not best in human life because there are so many sides effects of arts or movies. Besides which this arts do same children do 60% copy same away with this put effects on study and daily routine. Hence, it is apparent why many are against trend.
According to the arguments aforementioned above, one can reach to a conclusion that the benefits of arts or movies because with this development of country are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, its potential overlooked either.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 56, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...d of reasons which will further explain this arguments but the most preponderant one...
^^^^
Line 7, column 201, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...g one is that many people do like movies but the arts or movies is not best in hu...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, hence, however, if, look, nevertheless, so
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1252.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 254.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.92913385827 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.52624944609 2.71678728327 93% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.574803149606 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 388.8 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 75.8185088286 50.4703680194 150% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.818181818 104.977214359 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0909090909 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.09090909091 7.25397266985 70% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0857833363742 0.242375264174 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0432658111775 0.0925447433944 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.136818508136 0.071462118173 191% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0633601541813 0.151781067708 42% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109743006217 0.0609392437508 180% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.3 12.6369458128 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 53.1260098522 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.61 11.5310837438 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 55.0591133005 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.