Government should reduce their investment in arts, music and painting? A/D
One of the most conspicuous trends in today's world is the colossal upsurge in governments investments in fine arts. The discussion on whether the government should invest in art, music and painting is a debatable topic and people all around the globe are divided in their opinions. The subject attracts the majority of views from people and remains a hot topic among people of concern. In this essay, I shall scrutinize my opinion by providing relevant examples and explanation before drawing my conclusion.
At the outset, there are myriad arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one lies in the fact that art, music and painting enhance education and are part of our culture. In order to get an authentic reflection, these studies are pivotal to have knowledge of our history. The most impeccable example that could be provided here is that a recent research proved that the study of art and music increases education. Hence, I can substantiate my idea that investing in art, music and painting is paramount for our society.
Those who disagree with these ideas might have a cogent notion and could assert that the investment in fine arts has myriad drawbacks. Another angle on this debate suggests that the government should allocate the investments to health and education. The most pertinent example that could be provided here is that Colombia has reallocated half of the investments in fine arts to health, resulting in a 30 percent increase on their health index.
To conclude, after taking the above-stated points into consideration, I am inclined to believe that the investment in art, music and painting is prominent and should not be overlooked.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, look, so, then
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 27.0 20.9802955665 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 41.0 31.9359605911 128% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1406.0 1207.87684729 116% => OK
No of words: 277.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07581227437 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.79550153159 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 152.0 139.433497537 109% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.548736462094 0.580463131201 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 436.5 379.143842365 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 5.0 1.56157635468 320% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.3659388273 50.4703680194 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.153846154 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3076923077 20.9669160288 102% => OK
Discourse Markers: 1.61538461538 7.25397266985 22% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.315922752158 0.242375264174 130% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.10757145007 0.0925447433944 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105531541304 0.071462118173 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.190563209832 0.151781067708 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.05170077861 0.0609392437508 85% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 12.6369458128 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 53.1260098522 94% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 10.9458128079 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 11.5310837438 106% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.01 8.32886699507 108% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.