For a considerable period of time the question on reducing the government investment in arts and music has been a favorite subject of discussion among many intellectuals who are mostly divided based on their opinion. On one side stands the perspective that spending on arts and music shall be curtailed while the other side blatantly denies any such kind of measure.
This essay will discuss why cutting down on the budget of arts and music is the need of the hour.
The first reason to ramp down the investment in this sector is the reduced demand of the artistic skills. Due to increase in the popularity of the technology, music and art are not considered as the core subject to study. Not much of the arts and musical skills rather technologies are used for creation of most of the music and arts in the modern world. It has caused a increase demand for technology and thus more number of people are inclined to study technology than arts and painting. Hence shifting the investment to the technological sector has more benefits for the society.
Also, lack of jobs in the field of arts has lead many people to give up on their skills and learn the skills which can fetch them an employment. People are recording the music or painting the canvas only in their leisure time. Needless to say art is not fetching the same attention it used to fetch once. A continuous drop in the number of visitors to an art museum is a recent proof to demonstrate the lost interest in arts. Government should not be expected to bear the maintenance cost of the art museums.
In conclusion, the government need to carefully decide whether they can afford to keep investing a huge amount of money in the area of arts and science.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 20, Rule ID: PERIOD_OF_TIME[1]
Message: Use simply 'period'.
Suggestion: period
For a considerable period of time the question on reducing the government...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 370, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...arts in the modern world. It has caused a increase demand for technology and thus...
^
Line 4, column 491, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Hence,
...tudy technology than arts and painting. Hence shifting the investment to the technolo...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, hence, if, so, thus, while, in conclusion, kind of
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 20.9802955665 48% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 31.9359605911 157% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 5.75862068966 208% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1419.0 1207.87684729 117% => OK
No of words: 305.0 242.827586207 126% => OK
Chars per words: 4.65245901639 5.00649968141 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5803716121 2.71678728327 95% => OK
Unique words: 160.0 139.433497537 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524590163934 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 441.0 379.143842365 116% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.4 1.57093596059 89% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.209424864 50.4703680194 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 101.357142857 104.977214359 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.7857142857 20.9669160288 104% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.5 7.25397266985 62% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201816072307 0.242375264174 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703419785082 0.0925447433944 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0523037687878 0.071462118173 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.104885512499 0.151781067708 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.039897553072 0.0609392437508 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 12.6369458128 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 67.08 53.1260098522 126% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.69 11.5310837438 84% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.32886699507 95% => OK
difficult_words: 63.0 55.0591133005 114% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 75.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 67.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.