Has there been any recant invention that you think proved either beneficial or detrimental to the society? Support your point of view with details from your own experiences observations or reading
The recent inventions from last two decades are changed the human life a lot. Especially technological change is the biggest boom. The smart phones created a new trend in the human life about 80% of the world’s population are using mobile phones. People can hold it one hand for several uses.
Firstly, there are many advantages of the smart phones. Mainly smart phone are used for communication. People can communicate throughout the world by using these smart phones. Smart phones provided many different types of uses for people. People can learn everything by using the smart phones. People can use many number of apps that are useful to them. For instance, people can learn and improve their knowledge by using English grammar, vocabulary apps and so on.
On the other side of the coin, there are some negatives about smart phones. Radiation is main problem with the smart phone many people are suffering with some health problems by using this. People are very much addicted to for the mobile phone, by this they are unable to interact with other people who are sitting beside them.
By this we can conclude that, smart phones give many benefits to the people and less disadvantage. People should control the use of smart phones. so that, there will be no negatives with this, and gives more knowledge and information.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 200, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...ese smart phones. Smart phones provided many different types of uses for people. People can le...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 311, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun number seems to be countable; consider using: 'many numbers'.
Suggestion: many numbers
... using the smart phones. People can use many number of apps that are useful to them. For in...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 4, column 146, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...should control the use of smart phones. so that, there will be no negatives with t...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, so, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 28.0 31.9359605911 88% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1110.0 1207.87684729 92% => OK
No of words: 225.0 242.827586207 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.93333333333 5.00649968141 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.87298334621 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40799491407 2.71678728327 89% => OK
Unique words: 120.0 139.433497537 86% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.533333333333 0.580463131201 92% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 351.9 379.143842365 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 4.6157635468 0% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 13.0 20.5024630542 63% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 28.310194772 50.4703680194 56% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 65.2941176471 104.977214359 62% => OK
Words per sentence: 13.2352941176 20.9669160288 63% => OK
Discourse Markers: 2.11764705882 7.25397266985 29% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 6.9802955665 172% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0251517934571 0.242375264174 10% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0100997885524 0.0925447433944 11% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0201537054065 0.071462118173 28% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0217492009704 0.151781067708 14% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0151069485751 0.0609392437508 25% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.4 12.6369458128 66% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.28 53.1260098522 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.4 10.9458128079 77% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.43 11.5310837438 90% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.44 8.32886699507 89% => OK
difficult_words: 45.0 55.0591133005 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 4.5 9.94827586207 45% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 7.2 10.3980295567 69% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 10.5123152709 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.