How widely do you think the problem spreads that people spend too much time on work than their personal life and experience time shortage? What problems will it cause?
Recently, the phenomenon of people spend too much time on work than their personal life and experience time shortage and its corresponding impacts have sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of complex procedures is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that spending too much time on work than personal life by people can be a plus, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a general standpoint, experience time shortage as a result of spending too much time by people on work than their personal life can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that crucial issues, as well as ultimate outcomes, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered current policies. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both this common phenomenon and complicated procedures apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of a public arena, people spend too much time on personal life than their work causes a shortage in experience time might increase the consequences of critical needs. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of creative processes is correlated negatively with vital issues. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of this remarkable phenomenon.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of experience time shortage by people who spend too much time on work than their personal life far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of this unique phenomenon prove the significance of total outcomes, but also pinpoint thorny issues' potential implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1616.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40468227425 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0356103969 2.71678728327 112% => OK
Unique words: 168.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.561872909699 0.580463131201 97% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 379.143842365 138% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.12779491 50.4703680194 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.909090909 104.977214359 140% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.1818181818 20.9669160288 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.27272727273 7.25397266985 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.43864508965 0.242375264174 181% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.169565046784 0.0925447433944 183% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.180529680752 0.071462118173 253% => The coherence between sentences is low.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.293883375834 0.151781067708 194% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556687254032 0.0609392437508 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.6 12.6369458128 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 53.1260098522 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.05 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 96.0 55.0591133005 174% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.