Over the past few decades, there has been a high degree of the ambivalence over this matter, whether the poor public transport is responsible for the number of traffic increase on the roads. Whereas some people say that the poor public transport is the problem, I sanguinely believe that it's not. This essay will further discuss reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.
At the outset, while there are several compelling arguments to support this notion, but one of the most compelling reason is that people prefer to use the personal car over public transport. According to my own experience, when I was a college student, I conducted research which revealed that people are using cars over public transportation as car travel is more comfortable over public transport. Thus, The beneficial of using the car over public transport apparently can be seen.
On the contrary, skeptics conjecture that due to the poor condition of the public transportation system people prefer to use the car. Although it seems ostensibly veridical, It is the one-sided story. As a tangible example, research conducted by a reputed organization revealed that bad public transport system urges people to use private cars over public transport system. Hence, It is correct to presume a preconceived notion of the skeptics.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments from both the sides, I profoundly believe that the usage of the private car over public transport far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the benefits of using own car prove its significance, but also pinpoints implications of using public transport.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, then, thus, whereas, while, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1383.0 1207.87684729 114% => OK
No of words: 265.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.21886792453 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03470204552 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.85235096304 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.524528301887 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 429.3 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.151692635 50.4703680194 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.25 104.977214359 110% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0833333333 20.9669160288 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 6.9802955665 86% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 2.75862068966 181% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.00849145112949 0.242375264174 4% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.00378965243673 0.0925447433944 4% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0125688552185 0.071462118173 18% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.00699183027995 0.151781067708 5% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0121102052828 0.0609392437508 20% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 12.6369458128 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 55.0591133005 125% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
It is not exactly right on the topic in the view of e-grader. Maybe there is a wrong essay topic.
Rates: 11.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 10.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.