Some people believe laws change human behavior. Do you agree with it?

Over the past few decades, there has been a high degree of the ambivalence over this matter, whether the law changes human behavior. Whereas some people say that law does not impact human behavior, I sanguinely believe that it does. This essay will further discuss reasons to support this notion and then deduce a logical conclusion.

At the outset, there are myriads of reasons to support this notion, but one of the most compelling reason is that law affects the human phycology. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which revealed that local laws impacted the student's behavior. Thus, The beneficial ramification of the change in law apparently can be seen.

On the contrary, skeptics conjecture that law does not change the human behavior, its the environment. Although it seems ostensibly veridical, this is the one-sided story. As a tangible example, researchers from a renowned organization conducted research on this topic which showed that laws enforced in a city significantly change the human behavior. Hence, this is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the skeptics.

To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments from both the sides, I profoundly believe that changes in the law affect the human behavior. Not only do the change in law shows its impact widely, but also pinpoints implication arises after changes in the local laws.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 292, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'students'' or 'student's'?
Suggestion: students'; student's
...h revealed that local laws impacted the students behavior. Thus, The beneficial ramifica...
^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 83, Rule ID: IT_IS[6]
Message: Did you mean 'it's' (='it is') instead of 'its' (possessive pronoun)?
Suggestion: it's; it is
...law does not change the human behavior, its the environment. Although it seems oste...
^^^
Line 5, column 359, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...cantly change the human behavior. Hence, this is correct to presume the preconcei...
^^
Line 7, column 278, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...arises after changes in the local laws.
^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, so, then, thus, whereas, while, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 8.36945812808 36% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1208.0 1207.87684729 100% => OK
No of words: 231.0 242.827586207 95% => OK
Chars per words: 5.22943722944 5.00649968141 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89854898053 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.81132753818 2.71678728327 103% => OK
Unique words: 136.0 139.433497537 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.588744588745 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 379.143842365 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.8807492274 50.4703680194 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.666666667 104.977214359 96% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.25 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.75 7.25397266985 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.33497536946 75% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.352939588269 0.242375264174 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.13298770703 0.0925447433944 144% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.106656073938 0.071462118173 149% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.2233000072 0.151781067708 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0584489233317 0.0609392437508 96% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 12.6369458128 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 11.5310837438 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.5 8.32886699507 114% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 55.0591133005 131% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.