The importance of cars and airplanes in modern life. Give examples.
The recent advancements in the automobile industry are highly controversial with many people claiming that there is a proliferation of new modes of transport including cars and aeroplanes in the modern world. I firmly believe that they have now become a necessity in everyday lives of people and have improved the living standards. This essay will further elaborate this phenomenon and thus, will lead to a logical conclusion.
To begin with, there are various potential benefits of the modern transport system. Firstly, driving cars to work have made daily commutations faster, easier and convenient. Secondly, aeroplanes have reduced the longest journey to shortest duration ie. within few hours. This shows that distance is no longer a barrier when we have to travel to different countries. However, this has lead to certain problems like pollution and traffic congestion. Despite this, it is apparent that modern transports are a reliable and quick way to reach places compared to traditional forms.
In contrast, there are certain drawbacks that can overwhelm the potential benefits of cars and airplanes and the most alarming one is the pollution level which is peaking due to the increased use of vehicles on road. This can be combatted with the extensive use of public transport and replacing petrol and diesel with gas fuels. Furthermore, with an upsurge in vehicles and booming population, road congestion is a common sight these days. For this, effective and meticulous traffic management by the government is required.
In view of the arguments mentioned above, it is concluded that the advancements in transport system have offered mankind with a faster and a convenient mode of travel, although there are some downsides that cannot be overlooked.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 228, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'to the shortest'.
Suggestion: to the shortest
...planes have reduced the longest journey to shortest duration ie. within few hours. This sho...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, look, second, secondly, so, thus, in contrast, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 10.5418719212 142% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 8.36945812808 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1486.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 280.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.30714285714 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09062348924 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86123813645 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 169.0 139.433497537 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603571428571 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 56.2710108907 50.4703680194 111% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.0666666667 104.977214359 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.6666666667 20.9669160288 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0802177880964 0.242375264174 33% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0252924982962 0.0925447433944 27% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037001150254 0.071462118173 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0436839416512 0.151781067708 29% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0263448377925 0.0609392437508 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 53.1260098522 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.6 8.32886699507 115% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 55.0591133005 163% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.