Medical technology is responsible for the human’s life expectancy. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
The medical advancement in today’s world is widely debated and drawn attention from the public. While some claim that the recent technological innovations in medicine and science have improved the lives of people, others argue that these inventions are a havoc to humanity. I strongly believe that medical technology has increased the human life expectancy and given people a new life. This essay will further elaborate on both sides and thus, will lead to a logical conclusion.
To begin with, there are persuasive advantages of medical technology in recent times. Most importantly, the early detection and cure of life-threatening diseases like cancer are possible now. Moreover, the latest technological equipment and devices are now in place which provides a preventive measure against the catastrophic diseases. For instance, MRI scanners which were never available in early times are now used by doctors to scan the various body parts. Thus, it is apparent that medical advances have saved people to a large extent.
In contrast, those who argue against the medical technology bolster their argument on the hazardous effects of these technological advances. It is well-known that the radiations which these latest equipment emit are harmful and can lead to dysfunction of body parts. For example, the laser radiations which are used to burn the cells have adverse effects on the skin. Hence, it can be seen that medical technology have detrimental effects.
This essay discussed the potential benefits of medical advances including the cure and treatments of deadly diseases and its negative impact on our health. In my view, medical technology is evidently a saviour to mankind.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, for example, for instance, in contrast, in my view, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1430.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 266.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37593984962 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86289488272 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.582706766917 0.580463131201 100% => OK
syllable_count: 461.7 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.2385801356 50.4703680194 62% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.3333333333 104.977214359 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7333333333 20.9669160288 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.26666666667 7.25397266985 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 6.9802955665 43% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 2.75862068966 254% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.209860041073 0.242375264174 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.070810375121 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056259259124 0.071462118173 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120767037614 0.151781067708 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0276443607274 0.0609392437508 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 12.6369458128 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.63 11.5310837438 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.