International travel and tourism makes people prejudiced rather than broad-minded. What are its causes and what measures can be taken to solve this problem
It is observed that one of the major problem the world is facing today is humans becoming partial instead of broad thinking while travelling foreign nations. If timely intervention is to taken to solve this issue, the consequences can be incredibly damaging. However, before we can look at the right solution, the reasons behind it must be studied.
To commence with, there are several causes for the tourism leading people to think more partially. The most prominent one is that they need to spend more money at the place of travel, where everything is expensive. For instance, according to the research conducted by Western Sydney University, around 90% of traveller made biased comment that Australia is an expensive place. Moreover, the tourist during the travel do not have enough knowledge of the place they are travelling.
However, few result oriented remedies can be suggested for making people not to think partially when commuting abroad or at other places. One of the most significant idea to cater such problem is that masses should make themselves fully aware of the place in which they are intended to commute. For example, a survey conducted by United States revealed that almost 85% of visitors were happy, as they were already aware of their place of visit . In addition, the traveller must choose a convenient hotel instead of royal place for their stay.
In conclusion, as there are many causes for the behavior of people acting as prejudiced instead of broad minded, the solutions above can obviously sort out the difficulties.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 10, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun result seems to be countable; consider using: 'few results'.
Suggestion: few results
... place they are travelling. However, few result oriented remedies can be suggested for ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, look, moreover, so, while, in addition
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 8.36945812808 24% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 20.9802955665 71% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1134.0 1207.87684729 94% => OK
No of words: 232.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 4.88793103448 5.00649968141 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90276135726 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59509965351 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 143.0 139.433497537 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616379310345 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 355.5 379.143842365 94% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.5024630542 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 26.1884461308 50.4703680194 52% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 103.090909091 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.0909090909 20.9669160288 101% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.63636363636 7.25397266985 64% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.12807881773 73% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 6.9802955665 29% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.186175288539 0.242375264174 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682391716875 0.0925447433944 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0486455501949 0.071462118173 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.126124621931 0.151781067708 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0448137738277 0.0609392437508 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 12.6369458128 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 53.1260098522 110% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.08 11.5310837438 96% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.76 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 60.0 55.0591133005 109% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 9.94827586207 80% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.3980295567 100% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.