It has recently been suggested that the classical, or "dead", languages Latin and Greek should be re- introduced into the school curriculum. Those that oppose the idea claim that the ancient languages are of no practical use and no help in getting a job. Those in favor of the idea say that education is more about training the mind than preparing for a career.
Which of these points of view do you most agree with? Support your argument, where possible, with reasons and/or examples from your own experience and observations.
The inclusion of old and ancient languages like Latin and Greek into the academic curriculum has always been the point of discussion. Some people emphasize the importance of classical languages, while others maintain that they have no utility in practical as well as professional lives. This essay will further support the point that dying languages should not be taught in the schools.
Firstly, in the modern era old languages do not hold any meaning. Moreover, the emergence of English as a global language has sidelined the requirement of any other language. As an example, every job sector communicates in English and demands fluency in English as a pre-requisite for employees. Therefore, it is unquestionable that old or ancient language should be included as mandatory in syllabus.
On the other hand, teaching of ancient languages would bear no good fruit as the ubiquity of English has rendered it as a common man’s language. For instance, a student conversant with ancient language will be required to prove his metal in English fluency to make progress in professional domain. Thus, there seems no such requirement to preach dying out and ancient languages in schools.
To conclude, ancient languages compared to English are insufficient to provide an individual a better entrance in the employment sector, therefore, I opine that they should not be included in schools’ curriculum.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for instance, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 11.0 20.9802955665 52% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1193.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 223.0 242.827586207 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.34977578475 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86434787811 3.92707691288 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01983895199 2.71678728327 111% => OK
Unique words: 128.0 139.433497537 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.57399103139 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 368.1 379.143842365 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9460317418 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.454545455 104.977214359 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.2727272727 20.9669160288 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.36363636364 7.25397266985 129% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.305244034643 0.242375264174 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.116801679299 0.0925447433944 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0620338929108 0.071462118173 87% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.188031381644 0.151781067708 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0392807768145 0.0609392437508 64% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.75 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.16 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.