Recently, a debate has sparked about whether re-introducing classical languages such as Greek and Latin in school curricula offers any value to students and societies. Whereas people biased against the revival of these languages deem them as "dead" languages and claim that they have no practical value, those in favor of the revival, opine that these languages train the mind and should not be seen just from a career perspective. In this essay, I will discuss both the views and offer my perspective on why these languages should be re-introduced.
First of all, though not much in use in recent decades, these languages are considered rich by many historians. This is evident by the vast number of literature and history that can be found written in those languages. In addition, popular languages, such as English and Spanish, have derived a lot of words from Greek and Latin, thus highlighting the importance of these classical languages. Learning these languages would offer many advantages. For example, if these languages are introduced in school curricula, we would have a large number of people in those languages who can then explore the history and literature from the past.
People who do not want to have these languages taught in school curricula claim that such languages are of no value since they do not help students get good jobs. While they may be right to some extent, it can be argued that learning a language is not just about increasing one's career prospects. Instead, they train the mind and prepare people to pursue broader interests. For example, archeologists proficient in Greek and Latin languages can discover many things about the early civilization that existed in those countries.
Based on the arguments presented above, the advantages of re-introducing these languages in school curricula clearly outweigh the opposing ideas. I strongly believe that learning of these languages in schools should be highly encouraged.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 530, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...uced in school curricula, we would have a large number of people in those languages who can then ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, so, then, thus, whereas, while, for example, in addition, such as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 6.10837438424 180% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 33.0 20.9802955665 157% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1662.0 1207.87684729 138% => OK
No of words: 316.0 242.827586207 130% => OK
Chars per words: 5.25949367089 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.21620550194 3.92707691288 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.84194129913 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.518987341772 0.580463131201 89% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 505.8 379.143842365 133% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 4.6157635468 173% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.8608106836 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 118.714285714 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.5714285714 20.9669160288 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.78571428571 7.25397266985 94% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.341873885237 0.242375264174 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.119402598014 0.0925447433944 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0716159391458 0.071462118173 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223710965395 0.151781067708 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0710457132636 0.0609392437508 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 53.1260098522 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.52 11.5310837438 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 55.0591133005 134% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.5 9.94827586207 136% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.1111111111 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 55.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.