Many people in developed countries make maximum use of gadgets from labor-saving devices such as vacuum cleaners and dishwashers to computers. Despite many people using these devices, there is an ongoing debate on whether they are contributing to our quality of life or are they just adding complexity. In this essay, I will discuss why, though they have added some complications, they have been continually improving our living standards.
Many people use gadgets and devices to achieve efficiency and effectiveness. Devices greatly help them save time. For example, a task as simple as cleaning a house would take hours when done manually. But using a vacuum cleaner, it can be accomplished in a very short amount of time. People can utilize this saved time to perform other tasks that matter the most, such as visiting a relative or pursuing their hobbies. In short, the addition of these machines to people's homes has certainly helped them manage their time in a better way.
However, some people see these devices as adding complexity to our lives. This may be true in the sense that one has to learn how to use these devices, and when these devices get upgraded, there is additional learning needed to keep up with the changes. But, learning how to use these devices is not that difficult. Once you have learned them, the skills become reusable. For example, once you learn how to operate a washing machine, the basic steps will remain the same with every new model.
To recapitulate, labor-saving devices and gadgets have become increasingly necessary for households in developed countries. In my opinion, they have helped us become more productive and efficient, and overall, have increased our quality of life.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, however, if, may, so, as to, for example, in short, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 32.0 20.9802955665 153% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 31.0 31.9359605911 97% => OK
Nominalization: 1.0 5.75862068966 17% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1444.0 1207.87684729 120% => OK
No of words: 285.0 242.827586207 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.06666666667 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.10876417139 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67465562314 2.71678728327 98% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585964912281 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 468.0 379.143842365 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 12.6551724138 126% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.1003816318 50.4703680194 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 90.25 104.977214359 86% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.8125 20.9669160288 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.9375 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 2.75862068966 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 2.91625615764 240% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259793778605 0.242375264174 107% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0865911237207 0.0925447433944 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0749658619709 0.071462118173 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154893539758 0.151781067708 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0600187131913 0.0609392437508 98% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.4 12.6369458128 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.83 11.5310837438 103% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.75 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.