With the advent of computers, people's expectations and excitement rapidly grew. Over the years as computer technology evolved and started affecting lives in many ways, it sparked a debate on whether the technology is assisting us to be more productive, smarter and happier. In this essay I will discuss some compelling arguments on why and how the technology has contributed to people's productivity and effectiveness, but, at the same time, has affected our happiness.
To begin with, computer technology has greatly helped the current generation to be more productive and smarter. For example, banks have opened online services over the internet, where people can open bank accounts, transfer funds or even deposit a check. This has helped bank to consequently save their costs since they can do more with less employees. Meanwhile, they are also able to ensure more satisfied customers because customers are able to save time and money by utilizing the efficient ways of doing things.
Conversely, along with the development of computer technology, the world has witnessed a flood of information in the internet. This has not only overwhelmed people, but also confused them because they are not able to distinguish right information from the misleading ones. People are spending just too much time on the internet, and thus have less time for their family. This has instilled a sense of inadequacy and unhappiness in people.
To sum up, computer technology offers many benefits to humankind. In my opinion, increasing people's productivity and boosting smartness are some of them. Additionally, I also believe that the decrease in people's happiness is caused by the repercussions of the technology.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 379, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'people'.
Suggestion: people
...d how the technology has contributed to peoples productivity and effectiveness, but, at...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 445, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ffectiveness, but, at the same time, has affected our happiness. To begin with...
^^
Line 3, column 338, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun employees is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
...their costs since they can do more with less employees. Meanwhile, they are also abl...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, conversely, so, still, thus, while, for example, in my opinion, to begin with, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 8.36945812808 143% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 5.94088669951 34% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 38.0 31.9359605911 119% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1441.0 1207.87684729 119% => OK
No of words: 270.0 242.827586207 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.33703703704 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.05360046442 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98207033522 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.603703703704 0.580463131201 104% => OK
syllable_count: 460.8 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 41.1433531716 50.4703680194 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 102.928571429 104.977214359 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.2857142857 20.9669160288 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 7.25397266985 111% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.128919278467 0.242375264174 53% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0438343430388 0.0925447433944 47% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0445697823883 0.071462118173 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0755103436781 0.151781067708 50% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0230563477089 0.0609392437508 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 12.6369458128 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.2 8.32886699507 110% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.5123152709 114% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.