When computers became available to the general public for the first time, they brought a lot of excitement. As years have passed by, some people maintain that computers have made us more productive, smarter and happier than before. Alternatively, there are critics who oppose this view. In this essay, I will argue how the advent of computers have helped with our productivity and smartness at doing things, but at the same time, it has made us less happy.
Computers have definitely helped companies become more productive in providing better services and stay ahead of the competition. For instance, banks and financial institutions have adopted computer usage to the fullest. People can get the services such as opening a bank account and transferring funds online from anywhere that they have access to a computer. The usage of computer have made not only the service providers but also the customers more productive, since they can effectively and efficiently use their time.
On the other hand, with the adoption of computer technologies, people have become less happy. One reason could be that people have become busier than ever before. Companies expect its employees to yield more. This puts unnecessary pressure on them. Psychologically, people believe that they need to rush for everything. This happens at the expense of their peace and happiness. For instance, one recent study has showed that people one or two generation ago were happier than people today. In short, computer technology has affected our happiness.
To conclude, usage of computer technology has been rapidly increasing in every sectors. In my opinion, while they lead to better productivity and increased smartness, they have reduced the happiness level in people.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 40, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
When computers became available to the general public for the first time, they brought a lot ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, so, while, for instance, in short, such as, in my opinion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 10.5418719212 38% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1477.0 1207.87684729 122% => OK
No of words: 279.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.29390681004 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76462372817 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.587813620072 0.580463131201 101% => OK
syllable_count: 477.9 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 7.0 3.65517241379 192% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 12.6551724138 142% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 38.5643601858 50.4703680194 76% => OK
Chars per sentence: 82.0555555556 104.977214359 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.5 20.9669160288 74% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.22222222222 7.25397266985 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 6.9802955665 143% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.243096099596 0.242375264174 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0757601789638 0.0925447433944 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0596500101513 0.071462118173 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154398340826 0.151781067708 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0556786098819 0.0609392437508 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.2 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 47.79 53.1260098522 90% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.9458128079 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.11 11.5310837438 114% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.23 8.32886699507 99% => OK
difficult_words: 68.0 55.0591133005 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.