Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. Is it good or bad?

Essay topics:

Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. Is it good or bad?

cosmically. However, the debatable side of many of these advancements has now become controversial. Likewise, some masses reckon that large shopping malls are replacing small shops, while others contradict their claim. The following exposition will further bolster my views in this regard.
To start with, there are numerous aspects favoring the proposition, but the most conspicuous one stems from the fact that today with the rise of digital technology smalls shops are being replaced by large shopping malls. Large shopping malls pay the vital role in human life, as they provide tremendous of benefits to everyone. Besides, there is no fallacy in arguing that people gets discounts and offers on every item in large shopping malls. Also, today masses are able to get each and everything under one roof. Even, it is indeed a fact that in people shop for groceries, dairy products, clothes, shoes and so many things at one place.
Probing ahead, it would be justifiable to assert that people can buy every brand of things. Moreover, entertainment sources are also available in large shopping malls, such as gaming, cinemas, multimedia, foods etcetera, also masses can enjoy their leisure time at there. Furthermore, there are so many facilities available in large shopping malls such as parking place, escalator, lifts, air conditioner and so many which make shopping convenient and comfortable and attract to people for their side, also who cannot climb by stairs they can choose lift.
To sum up, since strong and validating points are there in favor of the proposition, so I would clinch by saying that large shopping malls have its own benefits, also changes are invite able and it is always good .

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 1, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Cosmically
cosmically. However, the debatable side of many of...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 551, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to lift'
Suggestion: to lift
... cannot climb by stairs they can choose lift. To sum up, since strong and validati...
^^^^
Line 4, column 213, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...es are invite able and it is always good .
^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, however, if, likewise, moreover, so, while, such as, to start with, to sum up

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 31.9359605911 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1431.0 1207.87684729 118% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.14748201439 5.00649968141 103% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59527414741 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636690647482 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 65.4011128006 50.4703680194 130% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.25 104.977214359 114% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 7.25397266985 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.33497536946 56% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 2.91625615764 137% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.325290301197 0.242375264174 134% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.108847636713 0.0925447433944 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.111811405412 0.071462118173 156% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.192455357206 0.151781067708 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0492835455111 0.0609392437508 81% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.4 12.6369458128 114% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 53.1260098522 91% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 11.5310837438 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.41 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.94827586207 85% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.