Both large cars and small cars have their advantages and disadvantages. Write about some of those advantages. State which type of car you prefer and why?

Essay topics:

Both large cars and small cars have their advantages and disadvantages. Write about some of those advantages. State which type of car you prefer and why?

In this ever advancing era, development can be seen happening comically be it in the social, political or economical aspect. The debate surrounding small and large cars, which was earlier debatable has now become controversial. However, I prefer small cars because it consumes less fuel; it is more economical, and rather appropriate for urban areas. The following exposition will further bolster my views in this regard.

On the one hand, there are several reasons why small cars are considered to be prons to people. One is that it consumes less fuel, and it is more economical for urban areas. Secondly, it can also be argued that less amount of fossil fuel is burned by a combustion engine. Emission emitted by compact cars is very low as compared to large cars. It should also be taken into account that small cars are suitable for urban areas. It takes less space in parking.

On the other hand, there are several argument in favor of my stance. One of the most preponderant ones is that large cars have more power than small cars it can be easily climb hills. While, it is claimed that large car provides more interior space for passengers. We can carry a lot of things or luggage’s with large car. In addition, it is suitable for uphill.

In conclusion, while there are strong arguments on both sides of the case, my opinion is that size and shape of car is more important. I would strongly recommend that small car has more benefits than large car economically.

Votes
Average: 5.5 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 30, Rule ID: MANY_NN[1]
Message: Possible agreement error. The noun argument seems to be countable; consider using: 'several arguments'.
Suggestion: several arguments
...arking. On the other hand, there are several argument in favor of my stance. One of the most ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, second, secondly, so, while, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 10.5418719212 209% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 6.10837438424 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 20.9802955665 124% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 23.0 31.9359605911 72% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1234.0 1207.87684729 102% => OK
No of words: 257.0 242.827586207 106% => OK
Chars per words: 4.80155642023 5.00649968141 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.00390054096 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.6098248284 2.71678728327 96% => OK
Unique words: 142.0 139.433497537 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.552529182879 0.580463131201 95% => OK
syllable_count: 396.0 379.143842365 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 4.6157635468 217% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 12.6551724138 134% => OK
Sentence length: 15.0 20.5024630542 73% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 27.6914537176 50.4703680194 55% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 72.5882352941 104.977214359 69% => OK
Words per sentence: 15.1176470588 20.9669160288 72% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.23529411765 7.25397266985 72% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 2.91625615764 309% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.282196344077 0.242375264174 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0947647639994 0.0925447433944 102% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.089193946229 0.071462118173 125% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.191280212567 0.151781067708 126% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0535432072063 0.0609392437508 88% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 8.7 12.6369458128 69% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 64.71 53.1260098522 122% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 8.0 10.9458128079 73% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.97 11.5310837438 86% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.32886699507 98% => OK
difficult_words: 61.0 55.0591133005 111% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.0 10.3980295567 77% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 55.5555555556 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 50.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.