Nowadays celebrities are more famous for their glamour and wealth than for their achievements, and this sets a bad example to young people. Advantages and disadvantages ?
Surely there has been no time in history where the lives of people have changed more dramatically. A quick reflection on typical day reveals effect of celebrity lifestyles on youngsters has been one of the prominent topics in the contemporary discussion. People have always held some conflicting views about this. This essay will discuss both sides of the argument.
On the one hand, I would like to say that today many youngsters follow to celebrities like, sports and movie stars as their role model. Youth follows them blindly and considered them as their idol. Moreover, the fame of any superstar depends on their hard work, constancy, fortunes, and uniqueness shown by people for society. Furthermore, Sportsmen motivate the youth to take part in sports which is good for individual physically as well as mentally. It is a good sign for youngsters to understand their passion and follow them with full dedication.
On the dark side, along with many advantages, there are some consequences too. Famous people displaying negativity can mislead young people of our society like many movie stars endorse in cigarette and alcohol brands. Numerous popular masses are notable for their lavish style, rather than their achievement which results to a negative example for the youth. David backhem is the best example for youth who have demonstrated his glamour’s life.
To sum up, I believe that the youth should be smart enough to select their role models. I don’t think that sports and actors prove to be good role models as they have more of a negative influence on young than positive.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, moreover, so, well, as well as, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 6.10837438424 65% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1338.0 1207.87684729 111% => OK
No of words: 263.0 242.827586207 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08745247148 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.02706775958 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.68366732134 2.71678728327 99% => OK
Unique words: 163.0 139.433497537 117% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619771863118 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 414.9 379.143842365 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 32.7010703189 50.4703680194 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 89.2 104.977214359 85% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.5333333333 20.9669160288 84% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.86666666667 7.25397266985 53% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 6.9802955665 158% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268156409202 0.242375264174 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0799570167914 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0655853253028 0.071462118173 92% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.144152376223 0.151781067708 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0687735069628 0.0609392437508 113% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.3 12.6369458128 89% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 54.22 53.1260098522 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 10.9458128079 90% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.5310837438 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.74 8.32886699507 105% => OK
difficult_words: 71.0 55.0591133005 129% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.