Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this? Discuss with appropriate examples.
Nowadays, superseding large shopping malls instead of small shops and its enormous impact have sparked a heated debate among the public all around the globe. Although many people contest that mega malls are highly beneficial, there are groups of individuals holding conflicting views. I am inclined to believe that the issue mentioned above play a pivotal role in the success of every society, and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social point of view, significant factors could be taken into account why I promote replacing large shopping malls instead of small shops. First and foremost is multi-story shopping malls correlated with depletion of small shops as well as local shops and these agents are inextricably bound up with each other. According to my experience, when I was a university student, I peruse the British journal of psychology published a report in which it claims that a competitive market and chain stores play a vital role in this respect. Hence, beneficial ramifications of both being affordable and window shopping apparently can be seen.
In political terms, there is no doubt that superseding multi-complex buildings instead of local shops could have negative results as well. One persuasive argument is that it leads to waste of time and waste of energy in addition to heavy discounts. For instance, scientific research undertaken by scholars of the prestigious university has indicated if had they have accurate information in advance, they would have faced problems effectively. Thus, this subject can cause online shopping, a modern society, and department stores.
To conclude, while there is compelling evidence on both sides, I entirely agree that the benefits of replacing mega malls instead of small shops outweigh its drawbacks. Not only the advantages of having recreational activities prove the importance of reasonable prices, but also pinpoint different products.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, first, hence, if, so, thus, well, while, for instance, in addition, no doubt, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 20.9802955665 114% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 31.9359605911 116% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 5.75862068966 174% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1632.0 1207.87684729 135% => OK
No of words: 302.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40397350993 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1687104957 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.86412930926 2.71678728327 105% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 139.433497537 141% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.649006622517 0.580463131201 112% => OK
syllable_count: 509.4 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.931034482759 322% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.7370409334 50.4703680194 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 125.538461538 104.977214359 120% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.2307692308 20.9669160288 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.234417424357 0.242375264174 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0715656125613 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0757598473852 0.071462118173 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.130427451998 0.151781067708 86% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.075250477291 0.0609392437508 123% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 12.6369458128 123% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.34 11.5310837438 124% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.9 8.32886699507 119% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.