The law can change human behavior. Do you agree or not?
The impacts of law on humans' behavior have sparked a public controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question "Is law can change human habits?”. While there are several drawbacks to the question, I completely agree with the statement and believe that the positive effects of the law are of high importance. This essay will elaborate on both positive and negative aspects of this subject and thus will reach a logical conclusion.
From a social perspective, introducing the law is strongly related to ensuring the safety of other citizens, which means it might lead to developments in society. For example, a group of reputable scientists working at a highly prestigious university conducted a qualitative study to demonstrate the relationship between illegal activities and an epidemic of petty crime. Therefore, this evidence presented thus far support the contention that breaking the law is positively correlated with not only minor crimes but also criminal behavior.
Moreover, I believe that imposing the rules is attributable to preventing chaos in the society, in that it would lead to maintaining the fabric of society and transmitting social mems. A well-known example of such attributions is standardizing people’s habit, which is cause for concern since it had been mistaken in taking law enforcement for granted. Thus, imposing hefty fines could play a significant role in preventing social unrest due to codes of conduct, leading to a sense of fear and keeping the society and country in an order and harmony.
In conclusion, passing the law can be mutually beneficial under different circumstances. However, I completely agree that an important piece of legislation not only will prove to be worthwhile but also crucial to the society.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 23, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
The impacts of law on humans behavior have sparked a public controve...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, thus, well, while, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 10.5418719212 104% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 20.9802955665 67% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1500.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 279.0 242.827586207 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.37634408602 5.00649968141 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12235551189 2.71678728327 115% => OK
Unique words: 172.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.616487455197 0.580463131201 106% => OK
syllable_count: 477.0 379.143842365 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 11.0 12.6551724138 87% => OK
Sentence length: 25.0 20.5024630542 122% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 32.6726817423 50.4703680194 65% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.363636364 104.977214359 130% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3636363636 20.9669160288 121% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.54545454545 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.203528039348 0.242375264174 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0716163801125 0.0925447433944 77% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0931307812658 0.071462118173 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.119665252279 0.151781067708 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0906714373307 0.0609392437508 149% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 12.6369458128 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 53.1260098522 71% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.22 11.5310837438 123% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.42 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 98.0 55.0591133005 178% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.94827586207 146% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.3980295567 115% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.