Recently the phenomenon of learning another language from childhood and its corresponding impacts has sparked a heated debate. Although contested by many that the matter of learning language from early ages is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded highly thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that start learning another language from elementary school can be a plus and I will analyze that throughout this essay.
From the social standpoint, learning a foreign language by children can provide a society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that better job opportunity as well as being high-motivated students, are inextricably bound up. According to my personal experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered children who start learning their second language in kindergarten are more motivated and predicted to have better career opportunities in the future. Thus, the beneficial consequences of being stimuli and having more job prospects in the future apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of education, the ability to speak new language in adulthood might increase the consequences of language barriers. Moreover, the fundamental aspects of stop learning a new language in adulthood related to this reality that the demerits of taking a long time for learning pertain to laziness and being busy with other works. As a tangible example, a scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of learning a second language when they are grownups is correlated negatively with allocating enough time for learning. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of learning another language in primary school.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of speaking a new language from childhood far outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of being more interested prove the significance of learning a foreign language in early ages, but also pinpoint being a fast learner implication.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 289, Rule ID: AFFORD_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the infinitive: 'to pertain'
Suggestion: to pertain
...rits of taking a long time for learning pertain to laziness and being busy with other w...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, second, so, thus, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 10.5418719212 161% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 12.0 5.94088669951 202% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 45.0 31.9359605911 141% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 5.75862068966 87% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1836.0 1207.87684729 152% => OK
No of words: 334.0 242.827586207 138% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.49700598802 5.00649968141 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 3.92707691288 109% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07539686937 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 139.433497537 137% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.571856287425 0.580463131201 99% => OK
syllable_count: 581.4 379.143842365 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 27.0 20.5024630542 132% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 52.8596149143 50.4703680194 105% => OK
Chars per sentence: 153.0 104.977214359 146% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.8333333333 20.9669160288 133% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.08333333333 7.25397266985 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284044583227 0.242375264174 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0954531267555 0.0925447433944 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0356066027114 0.071462118173 50% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151904201176 0.151781067708 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0382974807513 0.0609392437508 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.4 12.6369458128 146% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.61 53.1260098522 67% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 10.9458128079 137% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.92 11.5310837438 129% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.85 8.32886699507 118% => OK
difficult_words: 103.0 55.0591133005 187% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.3980295567 123% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.