In less developed countries are the disadvantages from tourism as great as the advantages?
The importance of tourism in developed countries which was always debatable has now become more controversial with many people claiming that it is beneficial while other reject this notion. This essay will further elaborate both aspects of this trend and this will lead to a logical conclusion.
There are myriad of reason which further explain this argument but the most preponderant one stems from the fact that tourism is most predominant is developed countries as well as develop countries gained lots of profit of money to tourism. Another pivotal aspect for the argument is that tourism increase country economy and popularity. Needless to say, that all these merits stand tourism in developed countries in a good stead.
However, there are some pitfalls that negate this argument and which can certainly overwhelm the potential influence of this trend but the most alarming is that some tourists combating with citizens as well as some tourist break countries rules and policy. As an illustration some tourists ruin countries prosperity by spreading litter and become a cause of violence. It can be agreed that the upside of is instrumental indeed. However, it has some various drawbacks as well. Hence, it is apparent why many are against tourism in developed countries.
According to the argument aforementioned above, one can reach a conclusion that the benefits of tourism in developed countries are instrumental indeed. Nevertheless, the potential drawbacks should not be overlooked either.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, hence, however, look, nevertheless, so, well, while, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 6.10837438424 98% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 20.9802955665 95% => OK
Preposition: 24.0 31.9359605911 75% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1281.0 1207.87684729 106% => OK
No of words: 237.0 242.827586207 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.40506329114 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.92362132708 3.92707691288 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82867259794 2.71678728327 104% => OK
Unique words: 130.0 139.433497537 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.548523206751 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 392.4 379.143842365 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 4.6157635468 108% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 3.65517241379 27% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 66.9626761711 50.4703680194 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.75 104.977214359 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.75 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.66666666667 7.25397266985 78% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.242902300567 0.242375264174 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0936272025107 0.0925447433944 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0885074749168 0.071462118173 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.155381340611 0.151781067708 102% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0965993312804 0.0609392437508 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 12.6369458128 110% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 53.1260098522 82% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 10.9458128079 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.1 11.5310837438 122% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.32886699507 106% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.