The main purpose of public libraries is to provide books and they shouldn't waste therir limited resources and space on providing expensive hi-tech media such as computer software, videos and Dvd's. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement.
Public libraries have played an important role in education and gaining knowledge of an individual. With the augment in technology many libraries have installed hi-tech media in their premises. However, some people opine that they shouldn’t waste their resources and space on these things, as their main purpose is to offer books. I strongly disagree with this statement. This essay will elaborate on viewpoints and hence lead to a reasoned conclusion.
There is a myriad of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that, providing videos and DVD’s in library can actually help people to grasp the information more precisely. It is quite clear that the visuals can deliver information more easily and faster than reading. For example, a video version of a book can be more interesting and easier to understand than to read whole book. Therefore these technologies can eventually increase the value and demand of libraries.
Another key justification for upholding this notion is that computer software like e-book is quite popular among people. Not only, large numbers of books are available in single device, but also an individual can easily choose from them and can save the lot of time. Nevertheless, to say these technologies are of immense value for readers and library in present era.
In view of arguments outlined above it can be concluded that including these technologies in library is not wastage of resources, as it provides colossal of advantages. Therefore, they are extremely important and hence cannot be ignored.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 106, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...aining knowledge of an individual. With the augment in technology many libraries have insta...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 407, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Therefore,
... to understand than to read whole book. Therefore these technologies can eventually incre...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, also, but, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, therefore, for example
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 6.10837438424 147% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 8.36945812808 131% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 5.94088669951 84% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1316.0 1207.87684729 109% => OK
No of words: 251.0 242.827586207 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.24302788845 5.00649968141 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98032404683 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89098665586 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625498007968 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 379.143842365 113% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 12.6551724138 119% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.5024630542 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.7092046709 50.4703680194 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 87.7333333333 104.977214359 84% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.7333333333 20.9669160288 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.4 7.25397266985 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.183090068787 0.242375264174 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0532237189911 0.0925447433944 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0494885778588 0.071462118173 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0981615527108 0.151781067708 65% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0545361408718 0.0609392437508 89% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.6 12.6369458128 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 53.1260098522 88% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.82 11.5310837438 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.4 8.32886699507 113% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 55.0591133005 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.94827586207 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.3980295567 81% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 72.2222222222 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 65.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.