Many companies involve employees in decision making policy. Some people think that it is important for the progression of the company. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Nowadays, participating employees in the decision-making process have become a long-running dispute among the public all over the world, which leads to a moot question “whether involving employees in the decision making process is reasonable or not?”. It is a widely held view that using employees as a member of the company to make a decision is highly beneficial, whereas I tend to believe that one must weigh up the pros and cons of this issue.
To begin with, it is a common belief that using employees to make an underlying decision in the company plays a vital role in the world of business. Therefore, I express several reasons to support this idea. First and foremost is the revenue of the company will be boosted and the quality is improved. Secondly, it is quite clear that the brand of the enterprise can be protected as well as the relationship between clients and employees is enriched. In addition to this information, a group of the sociologist, working at a prestigious university conducted that by involving employees in making a decision process gives a sense of cooperation, creativity, responsibility, job satisfaction, and loyalty to them. Also, the popularity of the company by the definite plan of the employee will be increased and the employees will enjoy having the lucrative business.
However, undoubtedly involving employees in the decision-making process provides people with various negative points. It should be taken into account that the company may face the financial implications, such as embezzlement. Moreover, the secret information of the company might be spread.
To recapitulate, I entirely agree that employees must be involved in the decision-making process to add the value to the company. However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce stricter legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 78, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...the decision-making process have become a long-running dispute among the public all over the w...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, however, may, moreover, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, whereas, in addition, such as, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 10.5418719212 152% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 6.10837438424 164% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 8.36945812808 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 5.94088669951 135% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 5.75862068966 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1621.0 1207.87684729 134% => OK
No of words: 305.0 242.827586207 126% => OK
Chars per words: 5.31475409836 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.17902490978 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.24863934885 2.71678728327 120% => OK
Unique words: 167.0 139.433497537 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.547540983607 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 509.4 379.143842365 134% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.5181697314 50.4703680194 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.692307692 104.977214359 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.4615384615 20.9669160288 112% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.1538461538 7.25397266985 140% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.251673263654 0.242375264174 104% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0894342979755 0.0925447433944 97% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666411972939 0.071462118173 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.160620575139 0.151781067708 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00963021707986 0.0609392437508 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 12.6369458128 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.92 8.32886699507 107% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 55.0591133005 145% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 18.5 9.94827586207 186% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.