One of the most conspicuous trends of today's world is that there is a colossal upsurge involving employees in decision making policy. There is a widespread concern that the company has always the risk of losing confidential data. We find many people in favour of or against this but in my opinion, I agree with the statement that it is important for the progression of the company to involve employees in decision making.
There are many arguments in favour of my stance but the most preponderant one lies in the fact that the employees share new ideas and concepts which help for innovations. In fact, not only do the companies save money spent on experts but the employees also feel inclined towards the company. Similarly, we can find overwhelming evidence in support of the fact that the employee involved in for decision making feels their ownership toward the project and the company too. Needless to say, all these merits stand for the company in good stead, as far as the potential of the company's staff is concerned.
Moreover, another pivotal aspect of this argument is that the company which are involving their creative employees in the decision-making process are getting progress in every footstep. Besides the advantages, there is the very high risk of losing their confidential information as an employee shift to the competitor.
For example, there are a number of researches by various governmental bodies that show that in Australia all the successful companies involve their best employees in decision-making. Hence, it is apparent why many are in favour of the company' staff to include while decision making.
In view of the arguments outlined above, one can conclude that the benefits of involving employees in decision-making are indeed too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 77, Rule ID: PROGRESSIVE_VERBS[1]
Message: This verb is normally not used in the progressive form. Try a simple form instead.
...this argument is that the company which are involving their creative employees in the decisio...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, if, moreover, similarly, so, while, for example, in fact, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 10.5418719212 133% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 5.94088669951 185% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 20.9802955665 110% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 31.9359605911 135% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 5.75862068966 69% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1491.0 1207.87684729 123% => OK
No of words: 294.0 242.827586207 121% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07142857143 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14082457966 3.92707691288 105% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87992415933 2.71678728327 106% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 139.433497537 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.520408163265 0.580463131201 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 462.6 379.143842365 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 0.0 1.56157635468 0% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 20.5024630542 117% => OK
Sentence length SD: 32.4151670604 50.4703680194 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.25 104.977214359 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.5 20.9669160288 117% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.16666666667 7.25397266985 113% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.12807881773 121% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 6.9802955665 129% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 2.91625615764 34% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.407296479685 0.242375264174 168% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.147789888029 0.0925447433944 160% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0830518897529 0.071462118173 116% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.223289874938 0.151781067708 147% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0872142593033 0.0609392437508 143% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 12.6369458128 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 53.1260098522 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 10.9458128079 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.42 11.5310837438 108% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.43 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 67.0 55.0591133005 122% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 9.94827586207 131% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 10.3980295567 112% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.