Many companies involve employees in decision making policy. Some people think that it is important for the progression of the company. To what extent do you agree or disagree.
Nowadays, the involving of workers in decision making has become a long-running dispute among the public all around the world, whcih leads to a moot question "is it advantageous?" Although some people disagree with this issue, I agree with invoving employees in making decisions.
From a psychological point of view, the involving highly-skilled workers is indeed bound up tightly with profit orientated companies, which it might lead to both productivity and productive workers. For example, a group of profound psychologists, working at a prestigious university, conducted a longitudinal study to establish the relation between individual needs and spiritual needs as well as strong suggestions. Therefore, this evidence presented thus far support the contention that clever employees is correlated positively with not only maximising profits but also progression.
In economic terms, the involving smart employees in decision making is undoubtely attributable to structural changes, in that it would lead to policu changes, organisational changes, and economic development. A well-known example of such attributions is entrepreneurs, which is cause for concern since they had been mistaken to take innovations for granted. Had they in advance, they might have had the opportunity to . Thus, could play an imperative role in.
To recapitulate, I entirely agree with . However, as every garden may have some weeds, the local authorities are recommended to enforce some strict legislation, and individuals are hoped to heighten their intellect.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 66, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
...f workers in decision making has become a long-running dispute among the public all around the...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...o take innovations for granted. Had they in advance, they might have had the oppo...
^^
Line 3, column 418, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
..., they might have had the opportunity to . Thus, could play an imperative role in...
^^
Line 3, column 426, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ight have had the opportunity to . Thus, could play an imperative role in. To re...
^^
Line 4, column 39, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
... To recapitulate, I entirely agree with . However, as every garden may have some ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, may, so, therefore, thus, well, for example, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 10.5418719212 85% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 4.0 5.94088669951 67% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 33.0 31.9359605911 103% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 5.75862068966 122% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1327.0 1207.87684729 110% => OK
No of words: 229.0 242.827586207 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.79475982533 5.00649968141 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.89008302616 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39767552112 2.71678728327 125% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.676855895197 0.580463131201 117% => OK
syllable_count: 410.4 379.143842365 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 78.8241079873 50.4703680194 156% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.7 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.9 20.9669160288 109% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.5 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.15909714103 0.242375264174 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0504022831909 0.0925447433944 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0480422717396 0.071462118173 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0921850633727 0.151781067708 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0465414265597 0.0609392437508 76% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.3 12.6369458128 137% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.6 11.5310837438 144% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.04 8.32886699507 121% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 55.0591133005 140% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 9.94827586207 201% => Linsear_write_formula is high.
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.