In many countries children are engaged in different kinds of paid work. Some people regard this completely wrong, while others consider is a valuable work experience, Important for learning and taking responsibility. What is your opinion?
Surely there has been no time in the history where the lives of people have changed more dramatically. A quick reflection on the typical day reveals working at early age has been one of the most prominent topics in the contemporary discussion. People have always held some conflicting views regarding its pros and cons. Let us examine both views before reaching a contrite decision.
To begin with, there are myriad merits of working at small age. The first and foremost, work is crucial part of life it teaches plenty of things about various life stages. Children get work experience by doing job in different places. Moving ahead, children also know about the value of money and also know we have to do a lot of hard work to earn money. While earning, some adults become very mature at small age because they passed through distinct troubles in their life.
On the contrary, every rose has its own thorns so there are some pitfalls of it. Firstly, become a worker at early age create immense problems in teenager’s life. Juveniles distract from their study because of many different problems. Last but not least, they have a lot of burden on their mind at small age because they have to do a lot of work for their daily bread and butter.
In a nutshell, from the above analysis it can be concluded that working at early age is good habit but authority should provide free education for those children who cannot afford their fees
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 215, Rule ID: NUMEROUS_DIFFERENT[1]
Message: Use simply 'many'.
Suggestion: many
...es distract from their study because of many different problems. Last but not least, they have...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, regarding, so, while, on the contrary, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 10.5418719212 66% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 20.9802955665 81% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1190.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 252.0 242.827586207 104% => OK
Chars per words: 4.72222222222 5.00649968141 94% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.98428260373 3.92707691288 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.39365658287 2.71678728327 88% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 139.433497537 113% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.623015873016 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 378.9 379.143842365 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.57093596059 95% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6551724138 111% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.5024630542 88% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.5488211374 50.4703680194 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 85.0 104.977214359 81% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.0 20.9669160288 86% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.92857142857 7.25397266985 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.153186770867 0.242375264174 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0552110245441 0.0925447433944 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0373695272191 0.071462118173 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0917581491477 0.151781067708 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0259384728558 0.0609392437508 43% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 9.8 12.6369458128 78% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 61.67 53.1260098522 116% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.54236453202 47% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.1 10.9458128079 83% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.8 11.5310837438 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.04 8.32886699507 97% => OK
difficult_words: 56.0 55.0591133005 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.94827586207 65% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.3980295567 88% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.5123152709 95% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 79.4444444444 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 71.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.