• In many countries, children are engaged in some kind of paid work. Some people regard this as completely wrong, while others consider it as valuable work experience, important for learning and taking responsibility. What are your opinions on this issue?
Recently, children’s engaging in paid work has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “is it completely wrong?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that it is a valuable work experience, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the socioeconomic standpoint, to be an income earner as a child are bound up inextricably with personal development, which indicates they lead to both interpersonal and social competence. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between financial support to the family and a sense of responsibility as well as an exponential increase in practical skills. Researchers, nevertheless, paid heed to poverty, discrimination, and fatherless families alike. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of becoming socially mature is correlated positively with not only economic attainment in life but also social development.
Within the realm of children rights, without the slightest doubt, having paid job attributes to a crime against children, in that it would come down to maltreated, abused, and abandoned adolescents. A salient example of such attribution is sexual harassment, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take educational training for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint psychological problems. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of the International Conventions on Human Rights.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that the disadvantages of working children are of more significance. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 84, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , &apos
...oes 'all's well that ends well,' after analyzing what elaborated above,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, nevertheless, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 22.0 20.9802955665 105% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1725.0 1207.87684729 143% => OK
No of words: 300.0 242.827586207 124% => OK
Chars per words: 5.75 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.16179145029 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.50646862559 2.71678728327 129% => OK
Unique words: 207.0 139.433497537 148% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.69 0.580463131201 119% => OK
syllable_count: 536.4 379.143842365 141% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 4.6157635468 130% => OK
Article: 3.0 1.56157635468 192% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 1.71428571429 233% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 8.0 3.65517241379 219% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 53.9920002841 50.4703680194 107% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.692307692 104.977214359 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0769230769 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.53846153846 7.25397266985 118% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.147592605224 0.242375264174 61% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0448422569299 0.0925447433944 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0518899790189 0.071462118173 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0903946060424 0.151781067708 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0729470609128 0.0609392437508 120% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.2 12.6369458128 136% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.37 11.5310837438 142% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.94 8.32886699507 131% => OK
difficult_words: 117.0 55.0591133005 212% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.5123152709 152% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 88.8888888889 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 80.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.