The scenario of children participating in a part-time job has become more prevalent over the recent years. While certain people believe it is appropriate for children, others reckon it as essential experience for learning and being responsible. From my perspective, there are merits and demerits in both sides, I opine that both view should be considered necessary.
Children who engage in part-time work may gain valueless experience which their peers and classmates may not acquire at school. In terms of the interpersonal skills, children are created with more opportunity to communicate and interact with the customer in the workplace. The social capability which the children acquire may pave the way for the future vocational career. Furthermore, children become more mature in terms of the mentality. To demonstrate, various difficulties which the children may encounter in the workplace often frustrate children’s mind. It is an adequate chance to polish their mentality. However, engaging in part-time job may render the children to fall behind in their academic study.
Apart from children involving in part-time work, some people firmly opine that children should fully commit in their academic study rather than taking a part-time job. This is often due to the fact that the academic capability is essential to children. One salient example of this is the future work, without the professional knowledge which imparted by school, people are incompetent to have satisfying performance in their future work. Nevertheless, children may not acquire the competence which is indispensable in the future work. Specifically, children are often given scarce opportunity to interact and communicate with others at school.
As argued above, there are pros and cons in both sides. However, to strike a balance of both sides will ultimately benefit the children.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, however, if, may, nevertheless, so, while, apart from
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 13.1623246493 99% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1590.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 288.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52083333333 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11953428781 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.97429834033 2.80592935109 106% => OK
Unique words: 153.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.53125 0.561755894193 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 501.3 506.74238477 99% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 35.625405965 49.4020404114 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.5294117647 106.682146367 88% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.9411764706 20.7667163134 82% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.88235294118 7.06120827912 55% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.196146388814 0.244688304435 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0623266472946 0.084324248473 74% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499203803229 0.0667982634062 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111969336694 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.07034345462 0.056905535591 124% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.0 13.0946893788 99% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.78 50.2224549098 93% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.44 12.4159519038 116% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.65 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.