Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on individuals & Society. To what extent do you agree?
In recent decades, a highly controversial issue has arisen regarding the detrimental impact of the social networking sites such as Facebook and Twitter. I firmly concur with the opinion that these sites have a negative influence on the people because of wasting time and gaining any benefits.
To begin with, the social networking sites have a negative effect due to the human wasting their valuable time. From my personal experience, a qualitative analysis was conducted by an eminent sociologist to explore further sending files and documents and sharing photos. Subsequently, final results revealed a highly complex relationship between alleviating the physical activities and doing homework even though the reduction of scores in schools should be taken into consideration. Thus, people can be fully informed about sufficient evidence of a causal link between putting the valuable times on the sites and their others activities.
Furthermore, people who participate in the social networking sites do not obtain any benefits. For instance, quantitative research was carried out at the Melbourne University concerning the uploading and downloading data. Indeed, if scientific research is inextricably linked to damaging their personalities, the preliminary findings are closely allied with the safety and not being secure. Hence, its likely outcomes would be significantly correlated with gaining the damage instead of the benefits.
To recapitulate, according to the preceding discussion, I am inclined to believe that the social networking sites have a detrimental impact on the humankind through the wasting time instead of gaining benefits. Moreover, not only should national institutions develop strategies, but also they should formulate them to discourage the youngsters to evade these sites.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, for instance, such as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 8.36945812808 108% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 5.94088669951 50% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 20.9802955665 62% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 31.9359605911 113% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1537.0 1207.87684729 127% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.73507462687 5.00649968141 115% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06087300106 2.71678728327 113% => OK
Unique words: 171.0 139.433497537 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.638059701493 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 379.143842365 130% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.2241828231 50.4703680194 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 128.083333333 104.977214359 122% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.3333333333 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5 7.25397266985 117% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.210602591919 0.242375264174 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0795613327993 0.0925447433944 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.084573400873 0.071462118173 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135149954269 0.151781067708 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0621633432388 0.0609392437508 102% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.8 12.6369458128 133% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 53.1260098522 61% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 10.9458128079 130% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 11.5310837438 141% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.56 8.32886699507 127% => OK
difficult_words: 99.0 55.0591133005 180% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.94827586207 121% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.