Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on individuals & Society. To what extent do you agree?

Essay topics:

Many people believe that social networking sites (such as Facebook) have had a huge negative impact on individuals & Society. To what extent do you agree?

The role of social media website have become highly controversial. Some people who are proponents believe that it is beneficial to the society while others who are opponents consider it has negative implications on the pupils. This essay will elaborate both viewpoints with relevant examples and leads to a plausible conclusion,

On the one hand, there is a cornucopia of reasons in the favour of social networking websites but one of the most conspicuous stems to the fact that it allows people to connect with each other to share knowledge. In particular, Facebook study groups anyone can join from anywhere and take part. For instance, a painstaking research study conducted by eminent scientists claim that knowledge sharing through online groups has positive impact on the world. Thus, give equal opportunity to learn and horn their skills.

On the other hand, there are some pitfalls that negate with positive side of the arguments, and can certainly overwhelm the potential benefits of these websites and one alarming one rooted to the fact it creates social isolation. For an illustration, a longitudinal study published in the high ranked reputable journal shows people who use Facebook and other sites and social isolated. However, the same article also proposes some solutions.

In conclusion, there are some merits and demerits to use these sites but the positives far outweigh the negatives impact.

Votes
Average: 7.7 (1 vote)
Essay Categories

Comments

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 68, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Some
...bsite have become highly controversial. some people who are proponents believe that ...
^^^^
Line 1, column 80, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
...ecome highly controversial. some people who are proponents believe that it is beneficia...
^^^^^^^
Line 1, column 157, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... beneficial to the society while others who are opponents consider it has negative impl...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 23, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...le conclusion, On the one hand, there is a cornucopia of reasons in the favour...
^^
Line 3, column 258, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'anyone' must be used with a third-person verb: 'joins'.
Suggestion: joins
...articular, Facebook study groups anyone join from anywhere and take part. For instan...
^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, so, thus, while, for instance, in conclusion, in particular, on the other hand

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 29.0 31.9359605911 91% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1190.0 1207.87684729 99% => OK
No of words: 224.0 242.827586207 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.3125 5.00649968141 106% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.86867284054 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.75889967622 2.71678728327 102% => OK
Unique words: 139.0 139.433497537 100% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.620535714286 0.580463131201 107% => OK
syllable_count: 381.6 379.143842365 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 4.6157635468 22% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.5024630542 107% => OK
Sentence length SD: 79.9284680198 50.4703680194 158% => OK
Chars per sentence: 119.0 104.977214359 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4 20.9669160288 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.8 7.25397266985 135% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 5.0 5.33497536946 94% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 2.91625615764 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.150471888462 0.242375264174 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0542173719176 0.0925447433944 59% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0371081489961 0.071462118173 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0903039983572 0.151781067708 59% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0095242119185 0.0609392437508 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.8 12.6369458128 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 53.1260098522 77% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 10.9458128079 120% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 11.5310837438 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.66 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 70.0 55.0591133005 127% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.94827586207 141% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.3980295567 104% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.5123152709 133% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.