Marketing strategies for big companies should be placed on offer and discounts, and in what ways this can impact on their reputations.
In recent decades, there has been considerable debate regarding the marketing strategies for the big companies to absorb the customers. I firmly concur with the opinion that discounts and offers exert an influence on their reputation because of the finding further customers and they can advertise new products and introduce themselves in the markets.
To begin with, offer and specials engender that companies find more buyers, which leads to their reputation. From my personal experience, a qualitative analysis was conducted by an eminent sociologist to explore further low prices and dropping prices in the stores. Final results revealed that there is a highly complex and linear relationship between an inclination for purchasing the commodities even though more sales and benefits should be taken into consideration. Thus, people can be fully informed about sufficient evidence of a causal link between high benefits and deals and discounts and people familiar with them.
Furthermore, the new products can sell and advertise with the offers, which causes the people familiar with their enterprise. For instance, a quantitative research at the Melbourne University was carried out concerning promoting themselves with new goods. Hence, perhaps if the scientific research is significantly correlated with cheap items, the preliminary findings will be closely related to both further performance, and people knowing
To recapitulate, according to the preceding discussion, I am inclined to the opinion that the companies with offers and discounts can have lots of customers and advertise themselves, which individuals know their name. Moreover, not only should national institutions develop strategies, but also they should formulate them to gain their fame.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 140, Rule ID: A_UNCOUNTABLE[3]
Message: Uncountable nouns are usually not used with an indefinite article. Use simply 'quantitative research'.
Suggestion: quantitative research
...ar with their enterprise. For instance, a quantitative research at the Melbourne University was carried...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, furthermore, hence, if, moreover, regarding, so, thus, for instance, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 10.5418719212 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 6.10837438424 131% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 8.36945812808 179% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 5.94088669951 118% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 31.9359605911 106% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1502.0 1207.87684729 124% => OK
No of words: 264.0 242.827586207 109% => OK
Chars per words: 5.68939393939 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03089032464 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.98142397 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 165.0 139.433497537 118% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.625 0.580463131201 108% => OK
syllable_count: 458.1 379.143842365 121% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 4.6157635468 43% => OK
Article: 4.0 1.56157635468 256% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 3.65517241379 137% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 12.6551724138 79% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 26.0 20.5024630542 127% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 82.8123783018 50.4703680194 164% => OK
Chars per sentence: 150.2 104.977214359 143% => OK
Words per sentence: 26.4 20.9669160288 126% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3 7.25397266985 128% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 2.75862068966 36% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 2.91625615764 171% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.207984392419 0.242375264174 86% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0834703127444 0.0925447433944 90% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0519615546623 0.071462118173 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.133914041536 0.151781067708 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494032209321 0.0609392437508 81% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.6 12.6369458128 147% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.63 53.1260098522 69% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.02 11.5310837438 139% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.43 8.32886699507 125% => OK
difficult_words: 92.0 55.0591133005 167% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.94827586207 111% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.4 10.3980295567 119% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.