Mass media including TV, radio & newspaper have become the essential part of lives
In most of our lives, various sources of media like television, radio, newspapers played a significant role in gathering information on things happening around us. Several people had an oblique reason on why these media’s were overruling them. This essay will talk about the pros and cons on the influence of these sources on people.
In contrast to what happened a few decades before, people couldn’t afford themselves to buy a television or a radio. The only mode of communication was, talking to others to get the information. The presence of these electronic gadgets have really hit hard in person-to-person interactions. As a result of this, people have become more detached.
This modern age with the proliferation of technological marvels like mobile phone and android tablets, information is shared much faster than how it was done before. People starting sharing messages in a single click from their phone and the recipient receives the message in less than 30 seconds. This information broadcast to millions of humans is done very efficiently and faster with these devices. Nevertheless, people are connected through virtual means in the form of logical circuits.
In my opinion, people should cultivate the habit of interacting with others by meeting them in person and talking. Although the electronic media’s brings you information faster, communicating in person brings in lot of comfort by expressing your happiness or feelings in a physical manner.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 274, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a physical manner" with adverb for "physical"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...y expressing your happiness or feelings in a physical manner.
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, nevertheless, really, second, so, in contrast, as a result, in contrast to, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 10.5418719212 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 6.10837438424 33% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 0.0 5.94088669951 0% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 31.9359605911 144% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 5.75862068966 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1257.0 1207.87684729 104% => OK
No of words: 233.0 242.827586207 96% => OK
Chars per words: 5.39484978541 5.00649968141 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.90696013833 3.92707691288 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.08570856968 2.71678728327 114% => OK
Unique words: 155.0 139.433497537 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.665236051502 0.580463131201 115% => OK
syllable_count: 387.0 379.143842365 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.71428571429 117% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.931034482759 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.65517241379 82% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.5024630542 83% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 36.2923696481 50.4703680194 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 96.6923076923 104.977214359 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.9230769231 20.9669160288 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.15384615385 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 2.75862068966 72% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 2.91625615764 206% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0849765399694 0.242375264174 35% => The similarity between the topic and the content is low.
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0303290202105 0.0925447433944 33% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0414529922642 0.071462118173 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0530598546354 0.151781067708 35% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0415076807397 0.0609392437508 68% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 45.76 53.1260098522 86% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.9458128079 101% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.69 11.5310837438 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.63 8.32886699507 116% => OK
difficult_words: 76.0 55.0591133005 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.94827586207 90% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.3980295567 85% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.5123152709 86% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.