Mass media like TV, newspaper and radio influence people, particularly young generation. Do you think it works as a pivot to shape the society? What is your opinion?
Recently, the phenomenon of mass media and its corresponding impact sparked a heated dispute. Although contested by many that the matter of information media is highly beneficial, such issue is regarded thoroughly both constructive and positive by a substantial number of individuals. I am inclined to believe that studying of means of communication can be a plus, and I analyze that throughout this essay.
From a social standpoint, the channel of communication can provide the society with some noticeable effects which are rooted in the fact that keeping up with the latest news, as well as entertainment programs, are inextricably bound up. According to my own experience, when I was a university student, I performed an academic experiment which discovered the influence of mass media on individuals’ attitude. Thus, beneficial ramifications of both patterns of behavior and youngsters’ traits apparently can be seen.
Within the realm of getting information about the broadcasting device, mass coverage might increase the consequences of criminal activities. Moreover, fundamental aspects of physical activity would relate to this reality that the demerits of widespread use of TV set or radio pertain to the health problems, such as obesity. As a tangible example, some scientific research undertaken by a prestigious university has asserted that the downside of means of communication is correlated negatively with violent behavior. Hence, it is correct to presume the preconceived notion of the time-consuming device.
To conclude, while there are several compelling arguments on both sides, I profoundly believe that the benefits of mass media outweigh its drawbacks. Not only do the advantages of getting the wide variety of information prove the significance of documentary programs, but also pinpoint social implications.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, apparently, but, hence, if, moreover, so, thus, well, while, such as, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 10.5418719212 95% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 8.36945812808 72% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 5.94088669951 168% => OK
Pronoun: 18.0 20.9802955665 86% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 31.9359605911 132% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 5.75862068966 191% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1578.0 1207.87684729 131% => OK
No of words: 278.0 242.827586207 114% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67625899281 5.00649968141 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08329915638 3.92707691288 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.43023664954 2.71678728327 126% => OK
Unique words: 177.0 139.433497537 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.636690647482 0.580463131201 110% => OK
syllable_count: 502.2 379.143842365 132% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.57093596059 115% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 2.0 1.56157635468 128% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 1.71428571429 292% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 12.6551724138 95% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.0977570955 50.4703680194 85% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.5 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1666666667 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.16666666667 7.25397266985 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 6.9802955665 72% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 2.75862068966 145% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.0980625865227 0.242375264174 40% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0312259984942 0.0925447433944 34% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0283407676421 0.071462118173 40% => Sentences are similar to each other.
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0547405608741 0.151781067708 36% => Maybe some paragraphs are off the topic.
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00711151140399 0.0609392437508 12% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.9 12.6369458128 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 53.1260098522 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 13.0 6.54236453202 199% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.9458128079 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.96 11.5310837438 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.8 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 55.0591133005 193% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 15.0 9.94827586207 151% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.5123152709 143% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.