Medical technology can increase the humans' life expectancy. Is it blessing or curse?
One of the most conspicuous trends of today's word is a colossal upsurge in the use of technologies in the medical field. There is a widespread worry that these medical technologies are unnaturally augmenting the humans' life expectancy. In my opinion, this apprehension is unwarranted and so should be rejected.
At the outset, there is a myriad of arguments in favour of my stance. The most preponderant one lies in the fact that medical technologies are avoiding infant mortality rates. Not only people can get benefits of less child mortality rates and high life expectancy, but they can also achieve healthy-disease free life and advanced medical facilities. We can find overwhelming in support of the fact that there is a positive correlation between the medical technology and health of the general people. Needless to say, all these merits stand on medical technologies sides as far as humans' health and happiness are concerned.
Moreover, another pivotal aspect of my stance is that it is developing in a hasty manner and its advantages to living things immense to measure. Besides, medical technologies are being used in different living things, from animals and plants to even the environment. For an illustration, research in this area invariably reveals that technologies are making the world a better place and it is not only providing service to humans but also to other living things as well. Hence, it is apparent why many people are in favour of medical technology as a blessing.
In view of the arguments, one can conclude that the benefits of medical technologies to human beings are too great to ignore.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 213, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'humans'' or 'human's'?
Suggestion: humans'; human's
...nologies are unnaturally augmenting the humans life expectancy. In my opinion, this ap...
^^^^^^
Line 5, column 72, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a hasty manner" with adverb for "hasty"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...t of my stance is that it is developing in a hasty manner and its advantages to living things imm...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, hence, if, moreover, so, well, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 10.5418719212 171% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 6.10837438424 82% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 8.36945812808 119% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 19.0 20.9802955665 91% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 31.9359605911 110% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 5.75862068966 52% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1366.0 1207.87684729 113% => OK
No of words: 268.0 242.827586207 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.09701492537 5.00649968141 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.92707691288 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.99966583124 2.71678728327 110% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 139.433497537 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.544776119403 0.580463131201 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 443.7 379.143842365 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 4.6157635468 65% => OK
Article: 1.0 1.56157635468 64% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 1.71428571429 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 3.65517241379 109% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.5024630542 98% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.1376395754 50.4703680194 72% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.076923077 104.977214359 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6153846154 20.9669160288 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.92307692308 7.25397266985 68% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.33497536946 37% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 6.9802955665 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 2.91625615764 69% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.343969463685 0.242375264174 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.120925837492 0.0925447433944 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0941941469679 0.071462118173 132% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.218817091443 0.151781067708 144% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0611779298343 0.0609392437508 100% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.9 12.6369458128 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 53.1260098522 80% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 10.9458128079 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.3 11.5310837438 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.4 8.32886699507 101% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 55.0591133005 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.3980295567 96% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.5123152709 124% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 77.7777777778 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 70.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.